I’m faced today with writing about another one of those books which has had a profound effect on me, but not really knowing quite where to start. I came across mention of it in a Twitter conversation – I can’t remember who started it, but it was about how poets died, and someone mentioned that there was a book on this topic. Its title, logically enough, was “Deaths of the Poets” and it was by two names familiar to me – Paul Farley and Michael Symmons Roberts. The reason I recognised them was because I had read their marvellous 2011 book, “Edgelands”, just before I started blogging; and it’s still on the shelves (and perhaps ripe for a re-read…) I couldn’t ignore these connections, and so sent away for a copy; and it was one of those titles which bypassed Mount TBR and got picked up as soon as I’d finished reading from #ReadIndies. All I can say is that it’s very much had a ‘Night Walking‘ effect on me!!
Published in 2017, the book very much does what it says on the tin! The authors, in their quest to explores the deaths of poets, set out on a series of journeys to visits relevant sites – whether of the aforesaid deaths, or of homes or important locations for the poets in question. Their travels take them all over Britain, Europe and America, and their range of poets is impressive.
The authors’ starting point is Thomas Chatterton, perhaps the most archetypal of doomed poets, dying young and leaving behind a body of work for posterity. The image of his death, painted by Henry Wallis, set the template for public perception of the poetic tendency, and was hugely inspirational; you’re probably all familiar with it, but here it is:
The self-induced death is perhaps the biggest cliche when it comes to thinking about the lives and deaths of poets, and the authors do of course explore the ends of names like Dylan Thomas, Sylvia Plath, Anne Sexton et al. These are particularly well-known, but of course the danger of a book like this is the extraordinary detail, the delving into obscurer poets I’d never heard of, or names I’d paid fleeting attention to before. John Berryman, for example, who jumped from a bridge; Frank O’Hara, who was struck by a jeep; or Robert Lowell, who had a heart attack in a taxi, on the way to visit his ex-wife Elizabeth Hardwick. The authors pay tribute to the work and the struggles of the writers they track down, meeting relatives, contacts and friends along the way.
So why didn’t she just let her anguish pour out on to the page? Why attempt to express such suffering in such a needlessly complex vessel as a villanelle? The reasons are many: because poetry is an act of making rather than simply an expression, because a struggle with form renders impossible subject matter possible, because the unfettered expression of strong feeling on the page almost always results in a dissipation of that feeling, rather than its evocation in the reader.
Of course, not every poet has a dramatic end, or indeed a dramatic life, and the authors are keen to point out that writers like Marianne Moore, for example, had a calm and controlled existence, as I suppose did Emily Dickinson. For every name you can pick out with a short, difficult life, there is another who lived into old age, calmly plying their trade. Well – or did they? And that’s perhaps the whole point of this book.
Whilst it may sound ghoulish or trivial, there *is* serious intent to “Deaths of the Poets”. Underlying the authors’ travels is a desire to work out if the doomed poet really is just a myth, or whether there is something intrinsically troubled about those who write verse. A good example might be David Jones; a war poet, responsible for “In Parenthesis” (and also incidentally an artist), he narrowly escaped death in WW1 and was damaged by it for the rest of his life. A recluse for a good part of his life, he suffered from PTSD and had several breakdowns. He did live to an old age, but his life was a troubled one.
It’s always an odd experience, visiting a place where poems you know and love emerged. Poems have many sources, of course, but we feel the mediating alchemy that was once at work here. The trees are coming into leaf and the leaves are falling in ones and twos. Larkin is simultaneously both more alive and more dead to us than ever.
Then there’s Larkin, who rejected the idea of the doomed scribe, wondering why a poet shouldn’t have a day job. He wrote the most wonderful, if gloomy, poems whilst working as a librarian for most of his life; yet it’s hard not to see an underlying darkness, and wonder if the self-imposed normality was his way of coping with that.
The authors’ travels are fascinating to read, and they present them in a non-linear fashion; so chapters will focus on a particular aspect of poetics and contain their journeys to various locations, such as Auden’s home in Germany, and William Carlos Williams’ in Rutherford, New Jersey. In some places, the original buildings have gone, or the landscape changed completely, and they’re left trying to come to terms with Chatterton’s place of birth in Bristol which is now in the middle of a roundabout… Their encounters with relatives and friends of the poets were enlightening and often moving; and I did feel I learned a lot about so many authors, old and new.
Farley and Symmons Roberts do acknowledge the sometimes uncomfortable nature of what they’re doing, and there is a running theme of the relics they encounter – at one point they wryly comment:
Would Auden have been horrified or flattered to see his chattels laid out under glass? A winding tower of the poet’s books, a Cinzano bottle, an ashtray and a pair of battered carpet slippers form a display (by now, we’ve gathered enough material for a small companion volume to this one: Footwear of the Poets).
They make several visits to archives held in universities and the like, and sometimes draw back, feeling that the death of the poet is too recent for them to feel comfortable rummaging through personal papers. The whole ethics of what a writer leaves behind can be difficult (Kafka comes to mind, with the fact that we can only read him because his friend Max Brod ignored the instructions to destroy all Kafka’s writings on his death). Yet many authors nowadays donate their papers to an institution before they die – which I suppose does give them more control over what happens to their writing posthumously.
I could say a lot more about this book, but I will note that both of the authors are poets themselves, and that added an interesting element for me. I’ve not read their poetic works, but I wonder which category of poet they would put themselves into? In the end, they come to no hard and fast conclusion about whether you have to be damaged to be a poet; after all, you could argue that that kind of thing applies to all artists, and also that most people in this world are damaged in one way or another. But their book is a fine tribute to poets and their work, a compelling and sometimes amusing read, and of course one which has had me creating another massive list of books I want to explore. I’ve only really touched on the fascination of this book, exploring as it does an art form which nowadays is not over-read; and indeed the authors do consider the longevity of poetry in our modern world. “Deaths of the Poets” was a most absorbing read, and now I need to go and check out all the names on my very long list… 😳