Marching with April by Hugo Charteris
My final read for 1956 is a book I didn’t even realise qualified at first, and certainly isn’t one I’d intended to pick up. The author is Hugo Charteris, a writer whose work is unfairly neglected and who is being championed by Michael Walmer; he’s reissued three of Charteris’s titles, and kindly provided copies for review. I read “A Share of the World” and reviewed it back in 2015, finding it a wonderful read, full of beautiful and individual prose. Mike reminded me that “Marching with April” qualified for entry into the #1956Club and as it sounded like a quirky comedy set mainly in Scotland, I really couldn’t resist….
While Lionel thought of this period a clerk sent out with letters saw his face and skirted him by a yard.
“Marches” tells the story of one Lionel Spote. A rather highly strung individual, fresh from a course of psychoanalysis, his view on the world is often dour and fragmented; his interactions with the everyday seem never straightforward and his mood can be measured by how out of alignment his shoulders seem to be… Lionel works for a publisher where the most stressful tasks seem to be dealing with the temperaments and eccentricities of the authors. However, suddenly Lionel inherits a country pile (Rossiemurchat) in Scotland from a great-uncle, a life changing event. Travelling north, throwing off (temporarily) the interfering nature of his mother, Lionel determines to sell the place and get back to his normal life. However, he has reckoned without in the influence of the local MP, the landscape and location, and of course his neighbours – the redoubtable April Gunter-Sykes (whose land ‘marches’ alongside Lionel’s) and her lovely but elusive daughter Laura. Quite how the enervated Lionel will cope with all this remains to be seen…
Lunacy, eccentricity – all forms of unrelatedness should be treated clinically. Instead they were elected to Parliament.
It’s clear from my readings of his first two novels that Charteris was a very individual writer, and I love this about his books. “Marching” is a very funny, very entertaining and, it has to be said, very odd read; the narrative is often fragmented and staccato, mirroring I think the state of Lionel’s mind, and following his quirky thought processes is very diverting! There’s also a darkness underlying it all, and I found myself worrying a little about Lionel’s fragile and often detached psyche as the book went on. I commented in my review of “Share….” on the fluidity of his writing , with the narrative often shifting perspective rapidly, and that’s even more the case here. The often elliptical, clipped and allusive prose (references to T.S. Eliot!) is clever though sometimes a little baffling; and though I loved it, I do think you have to be in the mood for this kind of writing! Interestingly, the novel comes with an introduction from Frederic Raphael and also reproduces a review of “Marching” by no less than Elizabeth Bowen. It seems from the book’s dedication to ‘Charles & Elizabeth’ that they may have been friends…
“Marching with April” was a great book to end the week with and I’m glad the #1956club prompted me to read it. It’s a book that warrants close and careful reading, and it’s a very rewarding one, full of memorable characters and locations; also very, very funny in places. Charteris really is an unfairly neglected author and kudos to Mike Walmer for championing and re-issuing his work!
(Thanks to Mike Walmer for kindly provide a review copy, and for his patience in waiting until the book found me at the right time! If you want to read an excellent piece on the re-issues, the TLS have covered them here)
Oct 11, 2020 @ 09:24:29
I like your point about the darkness underlying it all, Karen. A bit like Bowen’s comment about his ‘farce having a note of fury’. And no bother about the wait – I’d much rather you read it when you felt right to, rather than feeling time-constrained, and therefore obliged…Lionel features as a background character in the next one, due in a couple of months, if you’re interested……….
Oct 11, 2020 @ 10:12:30
Yes, I think Bowen was spot on there – there’s often an underlying anger with Lionel which I found fascinating. Equally so the fact he recurs in the next one, I may have to take a look at that one…
Oct 11, 2020 @ 15:52:20
It sounds like an intriguing pairing of style and humour. Definitely not one I would have heard of without the 1956 Club!
Oct 11, 2020 @ 16:13:44
It’s certainly a one-off, but I get the impression from the two of his books I’ve read that Charteris was pretty unique. Glad to have come across him! 😀
Oct 11, 2020 @ 17:40:54
What a good opportunity to read such an interesting book – and well done on a brilliant Week, too!
Oct 11, 2020 @ 18:37:36
It was – I hadn’t planned on this one at all, but I’m really glad I got to it! And it’s been a fab week – such wonderful finds and posts by everyone!
Oct 11, 2020 @ 18:52:26
A writer I had never heard of. Seems representative of one half of the great divide in Scottish writing between the wealthy – educated as ‘English’ but often fiercely Scottish – and everyone else.
What a great week it’s been – looking forward to the next one!
Oct 11, 2020 @ 18:55:26
He’s an excellent author – a unique writing style and very much unfairly neglected. Lionel’s reactions to the indigenous Scots is often funny and bemused! And yes, it’s been a fab week – such a wonderful response from people, and some fab books turning up! 😀
Oct 11, 2020 @ 19:29:51
This sounds like a really good novel, the writing style sounds like something you need to be in the right mood for but the humour and settling really appeal. Well done on another brilliant club week.
Oct 11, 2020 @ 19:32:06
It was a very entertaining read. Unusual prose but very sharp and funny in places – I enjoyed it! And the club week has been great – so pleased to see so many joining in! 😀
Oct 11, 2020 @ 21:28:15
This does sound truly original! I’d like to try this author, thank you for putting him on my radar Kaggsy!
Oct 12, 2020 @ 11:04:38
I hope you give him a go, Madame B, because his writing is rather wonderful!
Oct 12, 2020 @ 11:51:35
I started it ages ago but wasn’t in the right mood – I’m glad to read what you say about the fragmented prose, so it wasn’t just me! Now I know what to expect, I’ll be able to go back to it in the right frame of reading mind.
Oct 12, 2020 @ 13:28:31
I do think this is one you *definitely* have to be in the mood for. The humour is quite dark, really, and I did feel for Lionel – his issues seem to make it very hard for him to function well at times…
#1956Club – ready, set, go! – Stuck in a Book
Oct 13, 2020 @ 23:55:35
Oct 16, 2020 @ 20:30:01
Hah…love this post title! And I’m intrigued by your discussion of the book. Often times, funny and odd don’t make good bed-fellows, if it’s too odd it’s no longer funny and if it’s too funny it’s not really so odd. I like the variety you’ve encapsulated in this “year’s” offerings.
Oct 16, 2020 @ 20:56:43
😀 It certainly was an interesting combination. The humour *was* quite dark – but I like that kind! 1956 certainly was a good year!
Mar 03, 2021 @ 07:36:52
Sep 07, 2021 @ 03:30:18