Today sees the start of another wonderful week of Club reading – yes, it’s time to welcome you to the #1965Club! For one week we’ll be discovering, reading and discussing books from the mid-point of the 1960s, and for my part the hardest thing has been choosing what to read. 1965 seems to have been a varied and bumper year, and one from which I’ve already read many books. However, I wanted to read from the TBR as much as possible and so I’ve settled for a few titles, which I threw myself into with gusto after finishing “The Devils”. The first one I want to share with you is a science fiction short story – “The Doors of his Face, The Lamps of his Mouth” by Roger Zelazny.
Zelazny is a name I’ve always been aware of, in my various flirtations with sci-fi writing, but I’ve no idea how well-known he is in mainstream terms. He’s probably an author I’ve never read as I consider him more straight sci-fi, whereas I like my science fiction a little warped or off-kilter… However, he apparently also wrote poetry and fantasy, producing a massive body of work. This particular story was published in 1965 (of course!) and won the Nebula Award for Best Novelette in that year; it originally appeared in the March 1965 edition of “The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction”, and gave its name to the collection I have, which appeared in 1971. There is a story behind by obtaining of this particular edition, as I was in search of the cover art by one Dennis Leigh – the real name of musician John Foxx, who has a sideline in the arts! You can read about that here; that’s by the by, really as it’s the story we’re interested in, and I chose to just read the 1965 tale from the collection; although on the strength of it I plan to read more…
“Doors…” is set on the planet Venus at an unspecified time in the future when travel between planets seems routine; the planet is Earth-like and inhabitable, unlike the real Venus, and of course has been colonised by those voracious humans. The narrator is one Carlton Davits who describes himself as a baitman. As the story progresses it becomes clear that humans haven’t changed a lot; they still want to hunt, destroy and conquer, and the prey here is a Venusian creature called Icthysaurus elasmognathus – 300 feet long and known as Ikky. Davits has had a run-in with Ikky before, failing to capture the creature; however, an old flame, media celebrity Jean Luharich, is determined to capture an Ikky and recruits Davits to help. The dynamics are difficult, with tensions running beneath the surface and old wounds reappearing; will the search succeed and will Davits and Luharich survive the encounter?
Sci fi can be difficult, particularly when you’re dropped into a new world constructed by the author and with only hints of how it works. I always find it’s best to just go with it and see how the place develops; with a good author things will fall into place, and that certainly happens here. Zelazny’s Venus is a vivid and memorable place that really comes alive, despite his often spare narrative (I’ve seen it described as Hammett-like, which may be why I gelled with it). In 32 pages the characters and location develop, with their quirks and their baggage, so much so that you end up caring very strongly about their fate. Davits in particular has been affected by his surrounding, his encounters with Ikky, and the damage these encounters have caused; and Zelazny brilliantly captures the sense Davits has of meeting with something other, something different and unfathomable, on an alien planet.
However, as with all good sci-fi, I found myself pondering the deeper implications. Wikipedia reckons the story is a deliberately retro look at romantic pulp sci-fi which was apparently coming to an end. Yes, I can see that; however, I ended up considering what the story said about humanity and its selfishness and intransigence. Here is a brand new world, a planet humanity can travel to and inhabit; but what do we want to do? Hunt, catch and kill the indigenous creatures of the place. Plus ça change, as they say – colonialism of all sorts extends as far as rapacious humanity will take it and even crossing the final frontier will not change our species’ nature. It’s a thought-provoking story which raises all manner of issues – at least in my mind, anyway
So my first read for the #1965club turned out to be a good one; a new author, an intriguing and absorbing piece, plus perhaps an indication of 1965 works reflecting the changing times of that decade. I was pretty sure when we chose the year for April’s club that there would be some interesting reading turning up, and I can’t wait to see what bookish discoveries await… 😀
Apr 22, 2019 @ 07:36:45
I’m not sure this is for me (even with the Hammett-like narrative), but I can see why you found it a thought-provoking read. That’s an interesting cover on your edition, almost a nod to Picasso or Dali in certain respects.
Apr 22, 2019 @ 13:52:34
Yes, this won’t be for everyone I know. I found it fascinating though, and the intriguing cover is a bonus! 😁
Apr 22, 2019 @ 17:31:48
It’s interesting to see the range of books you cover across the week, even if they’re not all for me! (Tbh, I wouldn’t expect them to be. 🙂 )
Many thanks for co-hosting these Clubs. I know from my experience with #ReadingRhys how much preparation and dedication goes into these things.
Apr 22, 2019 @ 17:49:12
That’s half the fun of reading blogs isn’t it? I love seeing what people are reading, even if I wouldn’t read it myself!
And thanks for your thanks! It *does* take a bit of work for us to co-host but I for one really enjoy it (or I wouldn’t do it). I think they key is definitely planning ahead…. 🤣
Apr 22, 2019 @ 10:16:31
Great commentary. I read some Zelazny a long time ago. This story sounds so good. The issue if human nature is s fascinating one. We do indeed have some very bad things that are inherently part of us. With that I do think that as time goes by our cultures are improving and bringing out our more altruistic tendencies. Either way it is fascinating when writers tackle this stuff. Science fiction in particular, is very well equipped to do this.
Apr 22, 2019 @ 13:51:17
Thanks Brian! Yes, I often find that sci fi is a good place to tackle issues – you can sneak them in in ways that are perhaps less obvious than in mainstream writing! 🤣
Apr 22, 2019 @ 10:54:27
I read loads of Zelazny ages ago – loved his ‘Amber’ series, which I’ve always planned to re-read when I have the time. I’ve managed to get ahead for 1965 week and my review of The Drought by J G Ballard is up at my blog http://annabookbel.net/the-1965-club
Apr 22, 2019 @ 13:50:08
He’s certainly an interesting author on the strength of this. And I should have thought of Ballard! I’ll link you on the 1965 page! 😁
Apr 22, 2019 @ 13:53:56
I’m not a big reader of sci-fi but this sounds like it has much to say, about 1965 and now – we never learn… Sadly I won’t be able to join in with the 1965 Club but I’m looking forward to seeing what everyone’s been reading!
Apr 22, 2019 @ 14:15:48
It does indeed have a resonance – I do find myself wondering if humanity will ever improve, or whether the planet would be better off without us and just left to the plants and the wild creatures. Sorry you can’t join in this time – maybe in six months’ time! 😀
Apr 22, 2019 @ 18:29:43
As someone who reads very little Sci-fi this certainly not the kind I would probably be comfortable with. I can see though how there would be a lot to think about in terms of messages behind the story with sine resonance for the world now. What a fascinating way for you to kick off the 1965 club though.
Apr 22, 2019 @ 19:02:25
Possibly not, no – it threw me a little to start with, but as I got into it, it was still a story of human beings with human foibles and failings. Definitely an interesting way to start our reading week! 😁
Apr 22, 2019 @ 20:01:01
A great choice to start with – 1965 does seem to have been an interesting and varied year. Strangely, like you, I read a lot of SF in my youth but never Zelazny. I’m not sure what put me off as I remember him being widely published.
Apr 23, 2019 @ 06:06:50
It does, I’ve been spoiled for choice! As for Zelazny, maybe I thought of him as hard sci fi and I do tend to avoid space operas as the like. But this was very good.
Apr 22, 2019 @ 21:31:31
I think I’ve read a collection/anthology he edited, but I don’t think I’ve read any of his original work: this sounds like a challenging but rewarding read. And I love that you’re beginning with a short story!
Apr 22, 2019 @ 21:32:20
(Oops. I’ve inadvertently replied to you, 1stReading: sorry! Hello!)
Apr 23, 2019 @ 06:04:45
🤣🤣
Apr 23, 2019 @ 06:05:42
It certainly was intriguing and a good intro to his work, I think. And short stories can be easier to fit into a reading week I find…. 😉
Apr 23, 2019 @ 08:00:58
Thanks for this. Here’s my contribution.
https://harrietdevine.typepad.com/harriet_devines_blog/2019/04/roseanna-by-maj-sjowall-and-per-walloo-1965-club.html
Apr 23, 2019 @ 16:03:23
Thanks Harriet. I love the Martin Beck books! Will link later! 😀
Apr 23, 2019 @ 14:08:54
Glad it started well! I’m also very intrigued by “warped and off-kilter”…
Apr 23, 2019 @ 15:59:14
Ha! Well I don’t like mainstream, cliched space operas. I like things that push genre boundaries generally – I love it when people play with words! 😀
The #1965Club is here! – Stuck in a Book
Apr 23, 2019 @ 14:22:04
Apr 23, 2019 @ 21:11:33
I’ve heard of Zelazny but not read him before. Sounds good even though I don’t usually read sci fi.
Apr 24, 2019 @ 07:27:33
I tend to have phases of sci fi nowadays and fairly specific types, though I used to read a lot more sci fi and fantasy back in the day. This was a good one, though!
The 1965 Club | Pining for the West
Apr 23, 2019 @ 22:39:06
Apr 24, 2019 @ 06:25:15
I haven’t read Zelazny since the 70s but I really liked him then. Cool choice to kick off the week. I came across your and Simon’s blogs thru reading Moira at Clothes in Books and I have had the best time going thru the club years. Also girl you have the coolest eclecticism evah 😎
Apr 24, 2019 @ 07:30:24
Ah, thank you! Glad you found us! The big fun of the reading club weeks is the sheer variety of books, and 1965 is proving to be pretty wide! As for eclectic, I did consider using that word when I set up the blog – but most options were taken and I settled for Rambling instead. 🤣 I put it down to my grasshopper mind – I refuse to be limited to one kind of book!
Apr 28, 2019 @ 17:08:43
I read and reviewed Lady and the Fox Fur on Instagram
Arpita @Bagfullofbooks
Apr 28, 2019 @ 17:42:35
Fab – thank you Arpita! 😀