The Passion of New Eve by Angela Carter
First up, a bit of a TRIGGER and SPOILER warning. This post will discuss a reasonable amount of detail about this book, and it’s fair to say that it covers subjects like rape, anal sex, violence, bondage, sadomasochism, gender re-alignment and a lot of post-apocalyptic stuff. So, not a light, sunny read, really…
Where to begin? I first read Angela Carter back in the 1980s, and I liked what I read. I’m aware that Carter was an uncompromising author who pushed the boundaries and is not going to be a cosy read, but I was keen to re-engage with her work after quite a gap and as this one was published in 1977 it seemed the ideal place to go. Or perhaps not.
Broadly, the story tells of Evelyn, a young Englishman who decamps to New York; however, this is no regular city, but one descending into apocalyptic chaos. Gangs abound, whether people of colour or feminist groups; the rats are taking over; violence is the order of the day; and Evelyn’s behaviour is not particularly pretty in itself.
After a tortuous affair with a glamorous dancer, Leilah, which ends in unpleasantness and disaster, Evelyn heads off to the desert where everything goes to hell in a handcart. It was here I began to lose interest; suffice to say that Evelyn encounters the formidable Mother, a many-breasted entity; undergoes gender realignment; gets captured and repeatedly raped by a mad, one-legged poet; and so on and so on. I confessed I glossed over a lot of what was happening, because not only was it fairly unpleasant, I just wasn’t finding myself drawn into the story or caring about anybody in it.
I found myself wondering if I’d gone a bit prudish in my old age; after all, I read Burroughs and Kathy Acker in my teens without any problem, so did I just react badly to this because of the content and was I unable to see past this to what Carter was saying? And what actually *was* she saying?
This may be the problem I had with the book, because I don’t think actually that’s very clear. Evelyn is not a pleasant character as a man, and as any reader is probably going to anticipate, halfway through he becomes the Eve of the title. As a woman, the kind of treatment meted out to him is perhaps the kind Evelyn would have been happy to serve up to any woman he encounters – and certainly he’s pretty brutish while still a man. If Carter’s intention is to highlight the bad way that men treat women, then she wraps it up in a load of apocalyptic pseudo-mythology that for me really didn’t work.
Another problem was the writing; some of the early prose was excellent, really evocative and beautiful, conjuring up the crumbling city of New York and its denizens in a very evocative way. However, I found it often descended into cliché, particularly when dealing with the various sex acts, and the overall narrative seemed to lose coherence too often for me, becoming quite clunky in places. I really struggled to engage, but I couldn’t, so I lost patience and skipped through much of the book.
It may be that this book has dated badly and would have been more groundbreaking or innovative in 1977; or it may be that I missed something I was supposed to get out of it. Certainly, many online reviews rate “The Passion of New Eve” really highly, but it’s not one for me. I was sorry about this, because I’ve enjoyed Carter’s writing in the past; and indeed I was lucky enough to meet her at a film showing/signing back in the 1980s (and I still have the signed book to prove it!)
I rarely write negative posts because I try very hard to read books I’m going to enjoy, or get something out of, or that will stimulate or move me, or educate me, or make me think, or make me laugh, or make me cry. Unfortunately, this did nothing for me at all, except make me wonder what the point of it all was. So alas my first ‘bad’ read for ages was for the #1977club – let’s hope the next one is a bit more satisfying….
Apr 21, 2018 @ 08:54:06
Ah, I agree that sounds unusual. Haven’t read it myself but I usually get on fine with Angela Carter – but she always pushes at the boundaries, doesn’t she? And I suppose it sometimes works and sometimes it doesn’t.
Apr 21, 2018 @ 14:45:57
Well, I’ve always got on with Carter in the past too, and I will try her again. This didn’t work for me though, although I know a lot of people *do* rate it highly.
Apr 21, 2018 @ 09:44:29
It actually sounds interesting – a bit like Burroughs. It’s always annoying reading a book that doesn’t click as every page takes longer and longer to read. I had a similar reaction with my recent reading of ‘Baudolino’ but I think I was trying to rush it; after a break I just read it at a slower pace and read another one alongside it. It doesn’t always work though.
Apr 21, 2018 @ 14:45:15
Perhaps Burroughsian, yet – although it was too thin and lacking in structure to get there I think. Maybe i would have reacted differently at a different time – but I shan’t try this one again.
Apr 21, 2018 @ 09:46:17
Ugh! Can I thank you and Liz for saving me from ever making the mistake of ever picking up this book. Too much.
Apr 21, 2018 @ 14:44:16
It certainly wouldn’t be for you, Ali! :)))
Apr 21, 2018 @ 10:24:49
Ah! I remember reading Kathy Acker when it came out too.I came across a copy recently and thought about buying it to re-read, but looked within and couldn’t – the text now said nothing to me. I ought to read more Carter though – just not this one perhaps..
Apr 21, 2018 @ 14:44:03
I think our reactions to books *do* change over the years – and are probably affected by outside attitudes too. I don’t know if I would read Acker now either. But I will give Carter another chance! 🙂
Apr 21, 2018 @ 10:53:23
I’m not sure that the passage of time is entirely the reason why you didn’t like this. It seems to me that its a case of the author throwing everything into the melting pot without a clear idea of why…..
Apr 21, 2018 @ 14:43:15
Possibly not…. It *did* seem that the book lacked a certain coherence. And I guess that had I felt it was going somewhere and had a point to make, I might have found the nastiness easier to deal with. Or maybe I just have less patience with that kind of thing nowadays….
Apr 21, 2018 @ 16:20:09
I’m currently reading Carter’s night at the Circus. I appreciate how over-the-top her writing is, it is refreshing compared to the restrained texts I’m usually reading. That said I’ve been weary about trying The Passion of new Eve based on what I know of the plot but I’m sure I will eventually, I’ll just start with the ones I’m more excited above.
Apr 21, 2018 @ 16:23:53
I don’t have a problem with over the top – it was just the constant sexual violence that wore me down, and also the fact that the plot didn’t cohere for me. But I *will* be trying something else of hers!
Apr 21, 2018 @ 16:44:49
Yeah, that’s why I’ve been staying away from that one so far. Over-the-top and somewhat disturbing is fine for a change, but I fear that one would push my boundaries too far. But I’ll try it at some point. Only discovered Carter recently so there’s still much else from her to read.
Apr 21, 2018 @ 17:08:52
There is indeed – I have several on the shelf! 🙂
Apr 21, 2018 @ 17:49:46
Hard pass for me. I wouldn’t have finished it either. I haven’t read any Angela Carter but I’ll definitely avoid that one.
Apr 21, 2018 @ 19:36:47
She’s written better, I’m sure. I intend to find out, anyway! 🙂
Apr 21, 2018 @ 19:37:03
Seems very graphic in its content more so for the time it came out
Apr 21, 2018 @ 19:37:36
Yes, surprisingly so. All that stuff really got in the way of my trying to read the book.
Apr 21, 2018 @ 21:44:40
Yes it is definitely weird. I think it’ll be a while before I darken Angela Carter’s door again.
Apr 22, 2018 @ 11:53:52
LOL! I will try her again – maybe not straight away, though…. 😉
Apr 22, 2018 @ 04:01:43
I toyed with reading this for #1977Club but plumped for Barbara Pym instead and after reading your review, I’m glad I did. Mind you, I won’t lie, I am intrigued….
Apr 22, 2018 @ 11:53:12
Well, have a look and see what you think! Plenty of people disagree with me on this one. Though I think you made the better choice with Pym!
Apr 22, 2018 @ 09:57:28
I enjoy Angela Carter but she is baroque and it sounds like this became a bit of a mess. I have this in the TBR – it’s now slipped towards the bottom of the pile 😉
Apr 22, 2018 @ 11:48:18
Baroque is a good word. As is mess. I don’t think she succeeded with this one, but that’s my view. I’ll have to have a go with something else. Maybe The Magic Toyshop!
Apr 22, 2018 @ 12:56:59
OMG, Passion of New Eve is bonkers. I’ve been feeling like, the more I read Carter, the more I can see her limitations and the second-/third-wave-ness of her feminism; this, and her nonfiction book The Sadeian Woman, are things I’m glad I’ve read simply because they present questions of power and femininity in frames that contemporary feminism has discarded, and I like knowing what people thought in earlier decades of the movement. But as a piece of fiction goes, New Eve is distinctly third-rate.
Apr 22, 2018 @ 18:49:33
I think you might have hit on the problem I had there; we *have* moved on since then and although I lived through that era, I don’t know that I can necessarily go back to those attitudes and relate to them any more. Plus as you say, it’s not great as fiction…
Apr 22, 2018 @ 12:57:32
I hosted an Angela Cater week a few years ago and remember not everyone who picked this “enjoyed” it. While I’ve got most of her books and have read many, I always thought I keep this for last – – – or never. 🙂
When you announced the 1977 Club I was tempted but ran out of time. Yay.
Apr 22, 2018 @ 18:48:24
🙂 Yes – for once time was on your side by running out! I sort of wish I’d picked something else up now…
Apr 22, 2018 @ 18:49:57
I knew some people found it problematic but not like this. It doesn’t sound provocative, it sounds not that good.
Apr 22, 2018 @ 18:53:18
It only provoked dislike in me, I’m afraid. I didn’t get the point of any of the continual sexual violence, any more than I did that in The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo which I found equally repugnant. The danger with claiming that you’re only showing it to highlight the problems women face is that it tips over into titillation and simply perpetuating the problem rather than getting past it and improving things.
Apr 22, 2018 @ 19:46:01
I know what you mean. I find that problematic too. It was another time though. De Sade, Bataille . . . Considered as liberating. Not something I like.
Apr 22, 2018 @ 20:13:01
Liberating for men, maybe – not usually for women…
Apr 24, 2018 @ 13:53:04
I remember struggling with this too, though I seem to remember I liked the beginning in the decaying New York, but I felt I wasn’t really understanding it very well. Have you read Edmund Gordon’s biography of her? It’s really good and he makes a case for this (also about her very specific form of feminism), so I am thinking about rereading it some time. But there is a big slab of Carter I can accept is interesting or challenging without liking it. I know, for instance, that I am never going to read The Sadeian Woman, it’s just not for me.
Apr 24, 2018 @ 15:42:09
The beginning was the best bit, I feel. She certainly conjured the decaying New York although things began to deteriorate for me as the book went on, and I ended up struggling. I haven’t read the biography but I think I should. I want to read something else by her soon just to test my reactions – we shall see!!
Apr 25, 2018 @ 10:33:29
With many of her novels (those that I’ve read!), I do feel that the plot seems to spiral out of control a bit, but that might be because I’m so used to more obviously structured narratives. There is sexual violence in several of her novels, really the ones from this period as far as I remember, and I do find it problematic, I really hated it in this one. I have the impression she was a writer who liked to experiment and push the boundaries, but when you’re doing that you run a lot of risks and you don’t always succeed at what you do. Still, others then build on what you’ve achieved…
If you do read any more of her work I hope you write about it here. 🙂
Apr 25, 2018 @ 11:56:45
I find myself wondering if I’m less tolerant of the sexual violence than I was when I was a younger reader, and exploring lots of authors and books and genres for the first time. I don’t always need a structured narrative, but this one just didn’t do it for me and the violences was too much. Pushing the boundaries can be good, but you *do* lose readers sometimes. And yes – if and when I read more I will certainly write about it! 🙂
May 01, 2018 @ 22:19:37
I was surprised to find it so racist, to be honest, which really bothered me, and it just seemed really messy and horrible and out to shock. And I used to love her. We do chance, and I think life has made me less tolerant of shock tactics.
May 02, 2018 @ 10:41:06
Exactly that – shock tactics is a perfect description and the racism and nastiness was just too much. I shall try her again this month because she’s Virago author of the month – wish me luck….. 😉
May 21, 2018 @ 06:59:13
Aug 25, 2018 @ 08:32:08