Millenium Hall by Sarah Scott
I must confess that I’ve been a little lax lately in reading my Viragos – and it’s not as if I haven’t got a huge lovely TBR shelf of them! However, sometimes I need a little motivation to get me to focus on something specific, and the LibraryThing Virago group have been doing group reads of the VMC titles in chronological date order – that is, of original publication, so starting with some very early fiction by women.
The second book they tackled was this, and I managed to eventually track down a copy (an American Virago/Penguin release) so I could catch up with the group. Published in 1762, and known as a work of didactic fiction, it wasn’t necessarily the obvious type of work I would pick up – but I’m very glad I did!
Sarah Scott was a fascinating woman; she lived from 1720-1795 and was a novelist, translator, and social reformer, spending much of her life dedicated to writing, domestic female friendship and Christian philanthropy (it’s worth checking out her Wikipedia entry for more information). Scott had an unhappy marriage and when it failed spent much of the rest of her life with her close friend Lady Barbara Montagu; together the ladies did much in the way of helping other women, establishing cottage industries and helping to educate the poor. It was these ideas of good works that form the basis of her novel “Millenium Hall”.
The novel initially appears to take an epistolary form, but this is just a framing device to allow the narrator, a gentleman of property who has just returned from the tropics, to relate the tale of the ladies of Millenium Hall. This gentleman is travelling with a young coxcomb of a friend, Lamont, and they are forced to take refuge at the Hall when their carriage breaks down. It turns out that the narrator is related to one of the founders of the Hall, Mrs. Maynard. The narrator is delighted to rediscover his cousin; the visit is extended in the tranquil setting of the Hall; and Mrs. Maynard is prevailed upon to tell the history of the ladies involved.
There are Miss Mancel and Mrs. Morgan, friends since childhood but separated by circumstances and an unfortunate marriage (and apparently a portrait of Scott and Lady Barbara); Lady Mary Jones, uneducated in the correct way to behave in society and almost prey to a number of men; Miss Selvyn, who lost a lover and found a mother; and Miss Trentham, who loses the love of her life to a coquette
Although much of the narrative is couched in didactic language (and one of my fellow LT group members tells me this is how women were expected to write at the time), nevertheless it’s a fascinating read. Each woman has in effect been a victim of a man’s bad behaviour and has come through these vicissitudes by a mixture of luck or judgement or both; they’ve ended up with money which has enabled them to do what they want, and what that is, is to help other women.
There *is* a slight element of repetition in the women’s stories, with the convenient passing away of husbands or ageing relatives, providing a convenient fortune; but this was a necessary plot element to show what women had to contend with on a daily basis and how vulnerable they were to parental pressures and male wiles (and also the tricks of less morally sound females).
And it interested me very much that the women felt the need to withdraw from the world to live a rational and intellectually, artistically stimulating life; because that is what is portrayed here at the Hall. The women read, write, paint, sew and undertake all sort of creative activities which give them a fulfilment they’ve not had before. It seemed to me that it was much of the current modern life which was being criticised here, with its coquetry, cards and shallow behaviour (which I kind of imagine as a Vanity Fair world, even though I haven’t read that book)
I was also struck by the fact that women have often withdrawn from the world – in convents, in utopian settings and more recently in communes (though the latter tend to be mixed) as if the world as created by men will never treat them fairly.
There’s also much emphasis on education which I tend to concur with – not just in a knowledge sense but in a moral kind of sense, and I do feel nowadays that with the rotten examples set by the media, young people (and particularly women) get no real guidance about what is a good way to behave. We’re all independent women who can theoretically make our own lives the way we want them – but we’re still judged by the behaviour of all women and until that changes those of us who behave in a Miley Cyrus kind of way affect how we’re all viewed!
One element which I have to pick up on is, of course, class; society was rigidly ordered at the time Scott was writing, and it was women of the middle and upper classes who could take control of their lives in such a situation as this, and make a new existence in Millenium Hall. Those women from lower classes were helped and instructed, but had little autonomy and were expected to behave in the way the moral, upper-class women expected – and to be grateful for the help they were receiving!
However, sifting through the moral platitudes I was left with a vision of how Scott thought women might live: in a harmonious community, creatively productive, artistically stimulated and helping others. It’s a Utopian vision, but a strong one – very much ahead of its time and besides the fascination of the women’s stories, the book is worth reading to open a door into the past to see how their existence used to be; some things have changed, but unfortunately some problems are still recognisable today…
(For further discussion, it’s worth having a look at the LT thread here)
Terry
Jun 04, 2015 @ 08:20:26
Please could you post a photo of all your Viragos?How many have you got?I ask as i need inspiration to seek out unusual ones.
kaggsysbookishramblings
Jun 04, 2015 @ 08:52:09
Gosh! That would be hard, because they’re double shelved! If you pop over to the LibraryThing Virago Modern Classics group there’s a full list and lots of inspiration! 🙂
Fleur in her World
Jun 04, 2015 @ 09:09:05
It’s a long time since I read this, but I remember loving it. Yes it’s didactic, yes it has other failings, but revolutions have to start somewhere.
kaggsysbookishramblings
Jun 04, 2015 @ 09:31:03
Exactly! It’s such a pioneering work that it would be churlish to constantly pick flaws!
JacquiWine
Jun 04, 2015 @ 12:53:34
I hadn’t heard of this novel, but it sounds like an interesting insight into women’s lives in this period. (Love those green Viragos, such beautiful editions.)
kaggsysbookishramblings
Jun 04, 2015 @ 14:53:28
They *are* lovely, aren’t they? And this book is probably earlier than I would normally go in my reading, which is good, because it took me a bit out of my normal comfort zone!
Alex
Jun 04, 2015 @ 16:26:25
I don’t know this work at all but what I find interesting is that the writer felt the need to frame in in the voice of a man. Has anyone in the group passed comment on why this should be?
kaggsysbookishramblings
Jun 04, 2015 @ 17:18:06
I think the suggestion is that women writing fiction at this time was still regarded as suspicious, so using the male frame to voice the story got round this. The thread is here if you want to have a look and it’s very interesting!
http://www.librarything.com/topic/189583
heavenali
Jun 04, 2015 @ 23:04:29
It sounds like a really fascinating work, and one I was very dimly aware of. Sarah Scott was surely ahead of her time.
kaggsysbookishramblings
Jun 05, 2015 @ 08:32:54
She really was – it ‘s a pioneering work.
Liz Dexter
Jun 05, 2015 @ 11:16:26
I enjoyed this more than I expected to – my review is here if it’s OK to share https://librofulltime.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/book-reviews-31/ and I’ll link to yours there, too. A very interesting idea and a woman ahead of her time.
kaggsysbookishramblings
Jun 05, 2015 @ 11:25:39
Thanks for the link and of course it’s fine to share. It was a fascinating read and despite its flaws very much ahead of its time.
Book reviews – Millenium Hall, Virtual History and Cotter’s England, and two Thalia novels | Adventures in reading, writing and working from home
Jun 05, 2015 @ 11:17:29
litlove
Jun 05, 2015 @ 14:44:42
I tend to stop reading about 1830, but this does sound very intriguing. I love the idea of a female-only colony with such creative focus. Yes, old works were supposed to be didactic – that’s why realism was regarded with such horror when it was first invented. It showed people behaving the way they do, rather than the way they ought to, and was thus considered liable to have a dreadful effect on the populace. Books were supposed to be improving! (And it’s possibly one reason why I don’t read much in the years before realism…)
kaggsysbookishramblings
Jun 05, 2015 @ 15:23:58
I think I found the didactic element acceptable only because it was a feminist one – had it been a religious one, I think I would have been struggling early on! But I loved the creative element, the fact that the women were doing something all the time. But I don’t know that I’ll make the habit of going back to early works…. 🙂
Kat
Jun 07, 2015 @ 05:30:58
I love the word “coxcomb!” I’ve never heard of Sarah Scott, but am always meaning to read more eighteenth-century women. Really I should go back in time and ignore my 19th- and 20th- for a while. Good for Virago for publishing this. Very few of the Viragos are showing up around here anymore.
kaggsysbookishramblings
Jun 07, 2015 @ 11:31:07
I’ve read very little 18th century writing of any sort, so I should stretch my boundaries more often. What a shame that Viragos are getting thin on the ground…
Lory @ Emerald City Book Review
Jun 14, 2015 @ 12:19:19
Interesting — I just found some of the same themes (protest against the fashionable world, an artistic colony of women) in Louisa May Alcott’s An Old-Fashioned Girl. I wonder if Alcott read this book!
kaggsysbookishramblings
Jun 14, 2015 @ 12:21:08
How fascinating! Alcott is an author I’d like to explore more of – she’s pigeonholed very much by the Little Women series but it seems to me there’s more to her than just these!