For the last few years, the lovely blogger HeavenAli has hosted a Daphne du Maurier Reading Week, and so far I have spectacularly failed to take part. However I was determined that this year I would read something by DDM for the event and decided to start early. I have two of her books on the TBR, which have been lurking there waiting for the Reading Week all this time, and they’re “I’ll Never Be Young Again” and “The Glassblowers”. I had a look at the start of each of them and decided to plump for “I’ll Never…” – which was perhaps a mistake… 😳
“I’ll Never Be Young Again”, first published in 1932, was DDM’s second novel, and it’s narrated by a young man called Richard. The book is split into two sections, “Jake” and “Hesta”, and as the story begins we encounter Richard on a bridge in London, about to throw himself into the Thames. He’s obviously in a highly emotional, highly strung state; however, a passerby persuades him not to jump. This is Jake, a slightly older man who convinces Richard that he’s better off staying alive, and the two set off on some travels, hopping aboard a ship, working alongside the crew as they head off to Scandinavia, exploring fjords, meeting up with other young people and generally having plenty of adventures. However, this section ends dramatically, and the second part of the book sees Richard in Paris, attempting to find himself as a writer, mixing with a bohemian set, and shacking up with Hesta, a young music student. Things do not quite go as he plans, however, and the end of the book finds him moving into his more mature years in a very different situation.
So that’s a rough idea of the plot (and I confess some slight spoilers might slip in as I go on to discuss this book); but where was the problem? Well, the issue for me was Dick himself, who I’m afraid really did live up to his name…
Our narrator is the son of a national institution, a famous poet, and grew up in a household totally centred around the poetic genius. Living in a rich but cold atmosphere, he’s obviously very damaged, dominated by his father, and when we meet him on the bridge he’s run away from home after showing his parents some obscene poetry he’s written. He’s needy and immature, ridiculously naive, and so emotional! His behaviour is over-erratic, with mood swings almost from sentence to sentence, and this does overdo things a bit. In his relationship with Jake he’s incredibly demanding, and although I suspected homo-erotic undertones, nothing is ever spelled out although the two seem to be very close! Dick is so demanding of Jake that I did wonder how the latter put up with him – but then Jake is a complex man himself, having spent some time in jail for manslaughter.
The second section of the book reveals just how ghastly Dick is; his treatment of Hesta is vile, causing her to lose her focus on her music and in effect become a good time girl. He basically forces her into sleeping with him (I could use the R-word) but refuses to marry her because it’s a bourgeois thing. However, his view of sexuality is bizarre, as he considers her to have ‘ruined’ herself by developing a liking for sex – the usual double standards! I guess this was DDM portraying a typical male attitude – well, I hope so… Ironically, the end of the book sees a very different Richard who moves to a new phase, glad he is through that part of his life and will never be young again. Truly, youth really *is* wasted on the young…
So where are my thoughts after finishing the book? Conflicted, I think… Our insufferable narrator makes the book something of a battle in places, and even though I suspect DDM was trying to demonstrate the folly and selfishness of youth, he was just so unbearable as to make me want to chuck the book into the nearest fire. I know it isn’t necessary to like characters in a book, but Richard’s extreme selfishness is very hard to accept although I suppose it’s a tribute to her writing skill that she could create such a ghastly character – although I’m not sure that she necessarily meant him to be quite so detestable!
…I would lose myself in a conversation of trivial things where poetry was scorned; I would go where there were no trees and no placid grazing deer but the hot dust of a city and the scream of moving things, where life was a jest and a laugh, where life was an oath and a tear, where people hated and people loved, and beauty meant no empty word in the cool impersonality of a poem but the body of a woman. And so on, and so on, I dreamt with the pen still clutched between my fingers and the poor hidden life in me yearning to be free.
However, standing back and looking at the writing, I felt disappointed at times; the conversations are in particular a bit of a let down, coming across as very stilted when compared with the beautiful, often stream of consciousness descriptions. DDM really *could* write, and there were some beautiful parts in the first half of the book capturing the world on board ship, the feelings of fighting against the elements, the wonder of encountering mountains and fjords. These lifted the book, so much so that I think I struggled even more in dealing with Dick and his tantrums!
Looking back on “I’ll Never Be Young Again” I think in the end it was not a total disaster, but I can understand why it draws such violently different responses from readers. The downsides really affected my reading of the book and I’m still not sure if DDM intended it to be received like that, or whether it was a young novelist’s book; and indeed one which drew upon her own issues and family background, as from the little I know of this, I could see resonances. Certainly, if this had been the first of DDM’s books I’d read, I don’t know that I would have gone back to her. So I’m sorry my first participation in the #DDMReadingWeek is not as positive as I would have liked – but at least I did join in!!!
May 12, 2023 @ 09:26:39
I have Jamaica Inn and a biography of hers to read. This summer is the plan. I’ve only ever read Rebecca!
May 12, 2023 @ 11:22:38
TBH I can only be sure of having read The House on the Strand and some short stories, which I loved. But I’m picking up that her work might not always be consistent…
May 12, 2023 @ 19:19:44
Interesting
May 12, 2023 @ 20:48:07
😊😊
May 12, 2023 @ 09:52:34
“did live up to his name” hahahah! So glad you’ve joined in the week, and sorry it was with a dud. I have found that DDM can write the most wonderful books but also some quite awful ones – Julius was my nadir, with an awful lot of anti-semitism.
May 12, 2023 @ 10:53:28
I have Julius on the TBR and was going to tackle for the last DDM week but decided not to because of the anti-Semitism.
May 12, 2023 @ 11:23:07
Yes – even thought a book is older, if that element is very strong it’s hard to read now.
May 12, 2023 @ 11:25:16
LOL, I couldn’t resist that because he really did! I suspect that you might have to be selective with her works, which is a shame – some of the prose in this one was wonderful, despite my problems with the protagonist…
May 12, 2023 @ 10:15:05
I didn’t like Jamaica Inn as much as some people as it was Too Much for me, I’ve enjoyed the other ones I’ve read, but I’ve been very selective!
May 12, 2023 @ 11:24:14
I get the impression you might have to be with DDM. Some of her writings seem very powerful, but there are definitely problems with others!
May 12, 2023 @ 10:33:06
Having read your post and Ali’s, I suspect this is one for du Maurier completists rather than occasional readers of her work. Like Simon, I couldn’t help but laugh at your comments about the appropriateness of Dick’s name…he does sound insufferable!
May 12, 2023 @ 11:23:45
I would say definitely – mainly because of the protagonist, and he definitely deserves all the scorn you could pour on him!!
May 12, 2023 @ 12:05:32
I do like DDM’s writing. She had such an effective way of weaving atmosphere, and the story seems to start off in an interesting way. But I’m afraid I would hesitate to spend a lot of time in Richard’s company (I do like the way you’ve described him, haha!). And please don’t get me started on the double standards here! Anyway, this does sound like a mixed bag!
May 12, 2023 @ 20:52:07
Her writing is excellent, even here when the characters had completely lost me! So yes, a mixed bag, but the prose made it bearable!
May 12, 2023 @ 13:14:39
I’ll have to read this when I’m feeling in a tolerant mood towards Richard, but he does sound appalling. I have The Glassblowers in the TBR too – hopefully next year as I couldn’t fit it in this year.
May 12, 2023 @ 20:51:27
He’s pretty awful, so yes, be in the right mood for him! Maybe we’ll both get to The Glassblowers next time round!!
May 12, 2023 @ 13:40:55
I enjoyed this a bit more than you, I think, but I completely agree with you about Richard’s awfulness and the book as a whole is in my bottom few by du Maurier (I’ve read all of them now). Still, I find that even her weaker books are usually worth reading for the beautiful descriptive writing.
May 12, 2023 @ 20:50:49
He really is grim and got worse for me as the book went on! But you’re right about the prose – some of the descriptions of the mountains and fjords were just wonderful!
May 12, 2023 @ 18:24:25
I really disliked Dick, who did as you say live up to his name. There are bits of description that show her promise, but this isn’t a novel that can compare with Rebecca, Jamaica Inn and others.
May 12, 2023 @ 20:48:52
He was terrible, but the book really was lifted by the writing, and some of her descriptions were just lovely. But I’ll definitely choose one of her later works next time I think!
May 12, 2023 @ 21:15:15
Yes, I thought Dick was ghastly, too.
May 13, 2023 @ 12:22:41
Wasn’t he just!!!!
May 13, 2023 @ 00:37:52
Well, I can see from your review and the comments to avoid this one – thank you! I’m glad at least some of the writing lifted it into being a tolerable read.
May 13, 2023 @ 12:22:19
I couldn’t really recommend this to anyone, despite the beautiful prose – Dick is just…. insufferable!
May 14, 2023 @ 08:15:27
I’ve had fairly good luck so far with the DDMs I’ve read and enjoyed them all, even if to different degrees. This isn’t amongst the ones I’ve read but I can see a character like Dick getting completely on my nerves as well.
May 14, 2023 @ 15:28:33
He’s not a man that you could like, that’s for sure, though the book is balanced by some beautiful descriptive prose.
May 14, 2023 @ 12:43:51
I couldn’t get hold of any books in a hurry, so decided to re-read The King’s General, The Parasites (these two already done) and the Glass Blowers, which I will start today. I wanted to read most of DDM’s books so this one is definitely on my reading list.
May 14, 2023 @ 15:27:10
Well, as you sound like a completist I think you certainly will want to read this one. The characterisation was problematic for me, but there is some lovely writing and description!
May 29, 2023 @ 12:24:39
I take that as a compliment, being a completist. It is not always true unfortunately. However, it was in this case. I did not have a problem with the characterisation, but thought the revolutionary years were a little bit overstretch. The very last chapters of the book was very touching. I did not know, but could have expected considering the name du Maurier entering the story, that it was partly her own ancestors she was writing about. If you are interested, my review is here. https://www.thecontentreader.com/post/the-glass-blowers-by-daphne-du-maurier
May 29, 2023 @ 16:17:44
Oh, absolutely a compliment – I tend to be a completist myself when I love an author. And thanks for the link – I’ll check it out!