Those of you with longer memories will recall that #ReadIndies grew out of Fitzcarraldo Editions Fornight, an event Lizzy and I co hosted back in 2020. So while we have expanded our remit for #ReadIndies, I always like to fit in a Fitzcarraldo book if I can; and I was delighted that this month sees the release of a new essay collection by one of my favourite essayists, Brian Dillon. Entitled “Affinities”, it explores a series of visual images, mostly photographic ones, which have occupied the mind of the author over the years, and perhaps took on more importance during the COVID lockdowns. The result is a fascinating book which takes a look of those works of art which inspire us and the resonances we find between them.

I suspect it might have been sensible to have my trusty notebook to hand when reading “Affinities” – so many interesting quotes and ideas to remember!!
Born in Dublin in 1969, Dillon is currently UK editor of Cabinet magazine as well as teaching Creative Writing at Queen Mary, University of London. “Essayism” was his first Fitzcarraldo, and he’s written a number of books, myriad articles and curated exhibitions; “Affinities” is his fourth work to be issued by the publisher and it carries on the high standard of the earlier books (the other two titles are “In the Dark Room” and “Suppose a Sentence“, which you can read about if you follows the links to my previous posts!)
Affinity is a mood. A temporary emotional state, yes – but also something close to the musical or grammatical meanings. A mode, that is…
Dillon’s previous books have ranged far and wide over autobiography, essays and the point of them, the sentence as a work of art and much, much more. A regular subject is art and photography, where he often references such luminaries as Sontag and Barthes, and so it’s particularly interesting to see him explore mostly the visual in this work. The book features a series of pieces on specific works or artists, interspersed with essays of varying lengths on the whole concept of affinity itself; it’s an often nebulous word which can be interpreted in many ways, and Dillon is not only exploring the affinity we as viewers might feel with a particular piece of art, but also the affinities which we might perceive as existing between different artworks. These are subjective judgements, but can really affect our appreciation of a photograph or, say, a piece of performance art, and that very personal relationship between humans and something another human has created can be remarkably powerful.
The subjects of the essays run in broadly chronological order which adds a fascinating element to the reading of the book. Early photography features, from the very first images captured by artists such as the pioneering Julia Margaret Cameron; and it’s interesting to note through Dillon’s explorations that much of what we perceive now as atmospheric blurring, which is so effective in the photography of the time, was in fact down to technical issues.
The affinity…is a kind of crush, and like a crush it tends to mark one out for the moment as faintly mad. The one who feels an affinity embraces knowingly, eagerly, his or her own madness and stupidity. Idiocy. Affinity exiles us from consensus, from community.
Dillon moves on through artists such as Dora Maar, Claude Cahun, Beckett and Warhol; but he also looks at other ‘non-artistic’ images, such as scientific studies of sea creatures, visual representations of the auras producted by migraines, and even illustrations created from dreams. All of these works have come more into focus (hah!) for Dillon during lockdown, when the enforced silence and solititude forced us back into ourselves more than usual; and their importance in helping relate to other humans and find those affinities when we most needed them was significant.
Moving to more modern works, Dillon looks at contemporary creations from a fascinating array of artists, most of whom were new to me; that’s the danger of a book like this (and in fact all of Dillon’s books, with their lists of sources/references/recommended reading at the end, have left me with notebook pages full of things I want to follow up…) Of the modern creators featured, John Stezaker and Tacita Dean were particularly interesting; and as the books features a monochrome illustration to go with most of the essays, there was a useful opportunity to glimpse the works of the artists.
As for the ‘Affinity’ essays, these range across general discussion to more personal explorations the affinities reveal. Inevitably, one of the photographic images which moves Dillon most strongly revives memories of the early loss of his mother from a rare disease, an event which has so obviously marked his life. That photo triggers a look back to her life, to events which he feels drawn to revisit and yet will never truly be able to understand; it’s a poignant read and Dillon himself says “To write means to find reasons to tell you about my mother, about my ordinary orphanhood and ordinary grief.” Though I think it’s worth stating here that no grief is ever ordinary…
It has to be said that Dillon is a powerful essayist and his writing is always beautiful; he’s also an erudite author, drawing on the influences of those commentators of the visual I mentioned earlier. And the overarching concept for the book is a fascinating one; the original meaning of ‘affinity’ was an attraction of opposites, but nowadays it’s a word used more to indicate a close similarity between things, or an attraction to, or sympathy for, something. Certainly, we all sense our own personal affinities, whether with other people or with music or with art or with writing; and that’s the joy of a book like this, which is intensely personal, yet sets you off on so many trails when you feel an affinity with the works or artists Dillon is writing about.
As you probably know if you’re a regular visitor to the Ramblings, I love a good essay; and Dillon is one of my favourite modern purveyors of the form. “Affinities” was a joy from start to finish; fascinating, thought-provoking, often very moving, it made me re-see some of the artists of whom I was aware, create a list of those I want to explore more and also made me re-evaluate the resonances I sense amongst those creatives who are my personal favourites. A wonderful book by a favourite author, and another excellent release from Fizcarraldo!
(“Affinities” is published on 16th February; many thanks to Fizcarraldo for kindly providing a review copy).
Feb 13, 2023 @ 08:28:54
This sounds fascinating. Going straight on my list! Our relationship with images and the feelings they provoke in us is so interesting. I’ve often thought that when an image is over familiar we cease to really look at it.
Feb 13, 2023 @ 09:17:46
It’s a marvellous read – really thought-provoking, and gets you re-thinking the connections between the art you love, and also in my case created a list of artists I want to explore!!
Feb 13, 2023 @ 11:42:13
I love the idea of exploring photography that way, and of letting one’s writing be inspired by photography. What an innovative way to take a look at history and at our human condition. It’s fascinating, and I’m sure there’s solid depth in those essays.
Feb 13, 2023 @ 16:06:25
It’s a very clever book and wide-ranging in its explorations, definitely. An excellent essayist!
Feb 13, 2023 @ 12:55:55
This sounds very interesting, particularly because it sounds like the images he is writing about are not all things he has seen in person. I guess I would have thought that it is harder to be eloquent about visual images not seen in person but maybe that is his great skill.
Tracy Chevalier who wrote The Girl With a Pearl Earring recently posted a photo of her at what sounds like an amazing Vermeer exhibit in Amsterdam which is being called the exhibition of the century. One of the reviews stated “his works experienced a revival in the 19th century with the rise of the camera. This technology picked up on techniques that Vermeer had incorporated into his paintings, including his use of light and illusionist,” which I found very interesting.
Feb 13, 2023 @ 16:05:54
That’s an interesting thought, because of course sometimes we only see images in reproduction, not in person, and the experience can be so different. As for the Vermeer, how fascinating – I think that a photograph can be so effective as a work of art, as it can manipulate the reality in front of it just as much as a painting can.
Feb 13, 2023 @ 12:56:23
I’m also planning a Fitzcarraldo post this month in honour of the event’s origins! This sounds a really lovely and thought-provoking collection. You’ve also reminded me that I have Suppose a Sentence buried in the TBR somewhere…
Feb 13, 2023 @ 16:04:11
Excellent! I do love Fitzcarraldo books. And yes, Dillon is such a good essayist – Suppose a Sentence was great too so I hope you can find your copy!!
Feb 13, 2023 @ 14:34:25
This sounds like an extremely interesting work by an extremely interesting writer/essayist (I’ve dipped a little into his Suppose A Sentence). I really enjoy reading essays/reactions/criticisms of visual work (like you, I almost always end up with long lists of new things to explore); albeit I’m more interested in painting than photography, well — perhaps it’s time that I broadened my visual horizons! (I have started looking at photography more in the last year or two)
I’ve gone through various periods where I felt an “affinity” for a particular artist/painting but had never thought of comparing it to a “crush,” which is a great explanation of why I’ve also fallen out of love with various works over the years! I’m still mulling over Dillon’s idea that “Affinity exiles us from consensus” and community. A fascinating notion that I’d never before considered.
Thanks as always for a very insightful review!
Feb 13, 2023 @ 16:03:34
Thank you! He certainly is a fascinating writer, and I’ve enjoyed all of his books so far. His focus is on mainly photography, yes (although he even draws in the TV adaptation of Brideshead Revisited for one section) but it’s what I would regard as art. Photography is a difficult thing to classify, perhaps, as it can be so varied and wide-ranging – and as Dillon says at one point, you could argue that as much is done at the printing/editing stage of a photograph as is at the taking of it.
As for those affinities, I have had so many intellectual crushes over the year that I found it almost reassuring to read Dillon’s thoughts on this. It’s a subjective, emotional response, and we see resonances others might not. So the book rather helped me crystallise my thoughts on the concept, for which I’m very grateful!
Feb 13, 2023 @ 16:04:54
Sounds really interesting, Karen, and I recall your enthusiasm for Dillon from your previous reviews. I’m also a big fan of Dora Maar’s photography – Tate Modern put on an excellent excellent exhibition of her work a few years ago – so I may well check this out.
Feb 13, 2023 @ 16:07:35
I think he’s one of our best contemporary essayists, and he always makes me look at things differently after I’ve read him, which I regard as a success! I’d be keen to know what you think of him if you read him!
Feb 13, 2023 @ 16:50:56
Sadly, I still haven’t read any of Dillon’s books although there are a couple of them on my TBR. From your lovely review I think this one looks like a book I might have a particular affinity with. The ideas around humans having strong connections to images created by other humans is especially pertinent in this time when the subject of AI and art is so fraught.
Feb 13, 2023 @ 17:00:47
He’s definitely an author I’d recommend, and all of his books have read have been wonderful, although they are quite different. But this is very timely, and what you say about AI is interesting – I hadn’t really thought about this aspect, but I think as I often feel a personal connection or resonance with an artist or creator, I would struggle to relate to AI art… It’s the heart and soul and part of themselves that an artist’s put into a work which can come through and cause those affinities.
Feb 13, 2023 @ 18:12:50
This sounds excellent. I have Suppose a Sentence in my TBR, hopefully I get to it soon. I love those magpie-like books that dip from here to there, always circling the same nugget.
Feb 13, 2023 @ 18:36:16
That’s such a good way to describe it! Maybe that’s why that kind of book appeals to my grasshopper brain!!
Feb 13, 2023 @ 19:04:04
‘Affinity’ reminds me strongly of the German term Affekt – that is, a powerful emotional connection – I was taught this about late Baroque and early classical music when it was applied to “the ability of music to stir emotions” through attention to detail and appropriate execution, all done with taste and understanding of contemporary practice. I’d be interested if Dillon brings affekt into the discussion here!
Feb 14, 2023 @ 10:40:24
That’s really interesting Chris – I don’t recall Dillon mentioning affekt here, but his focus is very much on the visual here. Certainly, the emotions are definitely involved in the affinities I feel with and between things!
Feb 14, 2023 @ 12:42:21
This does sound excellent. Photography played a big part in my childhood as my dad was a very keen amateur photographer. I grew up with a love of photographic images and some appreciation of photography as an art form and how photos remain so important to us.
Feb 14, 2023 @ 12:45:15
Oh, that’s interesting! My dad was keen on his camera too. and often went for the slide format – which does mean I have inherited boxes of the things which I must try to get coverted someday, as there are loads from our holiday in the USA when I was 15. Yes, photos are so important, particularly when they record places and people we’ve lost.
Feb 15, 2023 @ 20:35:15
I haven’t read any of Dillon’s work – in fact, I don’t really read essays of this sort. But he is coming to Edinburgh to launch this so I may use that as the push I need!
Feb 16, 2023 @ 12:07:26
Oh, well might be worth you going along if you can – if he’s as interesting at speaking as he is at writing that would be fun!
Feb 20, 2023 @ 18:41:50
High praise from someone who loves an essay as much as you do! Nice to hark back to the original version of this challenge, too, well done!
As you know, I’ve been reading very commercially published books but I have an indie read and not yet reviewed and about to start a Michael Walmer so I’ll have a couple more to contribute!
Feb 20, 2023 @ 19:00:21
I do love a good essay, and I love a Fitzcarraldo too, so it was win-win!
And glad you have some indies to share – will look forward to them!!
May 11, 2023 @ 08:24:10
Excellent & promising 😊 I have just started Dillon’s book, reading it in tandem with Teju Cole’s BLACK PAPER.
May 11, 2023 @ 11:13:53
I think Dillon’s a marvellous writer – I’ve loved all of his titles I’ve read!