Back in 2016, I revisited a translated work that I’d first read back in my 20s; the book was “On the Marble Cliffs” by Ernst Junger, and it was a fascinating, if potentially controversial, book. German author Junger fought in both First and Second World Wars; he was a member of an elite, yet held himself apart from the Nazi regime. His work survived without being burnt, he was not particularly punished after the war and “Cliffs” is described by some as being critical of Nazism in particular and tyranny in general. So this is a complex work to consider, despite its novella length, and as it’s now been reissued by NYRB Classics more will have the chance to explore it.
The book is set amongst the Marble Cliffs next to the Marina. Here live the narrator and Brother Otho (his actual brother, but also colleague in work), in chambers carved out of and into the cliff face. The two men, together with their slightly witchy servant, Lampusa, as well as the narrator’s son Esio (product of a liaison with Lampusa’s daughter) live a fairly peaceful life; the men study the local plant life, following in the steps of the great Linnaeus, gathering and cataloging specimens. Esio lives a charmed existence, befriending the local snake population while Lampusa cares for their needs. A couple of times a year they are involved in wine-making festivities but for the rest of the time they maintain their scholarly detachment.
All of this, however, is to come under threat, as the forces of the Forest Ranger and his opponents are clashing below the cliffs. There are several different factions living locally, and the normally controlled and measured behaviour of the populace is disintegrating. It transpires that the narrator and Otho are veterans of a previous conflict who have chosen to turn their backs on this kind of life and lead a peaceful existence of scholarship and meditation. However the emerging conflict may lead to the necessity of taking action or taking sides – for how long can the brothers ignore events outside their haven of study?
So we raised a glass to old and distant friends and to the countries of this world. Trepidation comes over us all when the winds of death blow. Then we eat and drink, wondering how much longer we will have a place at the table. For ours is a beautiful world.
“Marble Cliffs” is a fascinating read; the landscape and setting of the Great Marina is wonderfully and vividly conjured up, and Junger seamlessly blends elements of what sound like real geography and races with his fantasy location to create a very believable world. His attention to detail is particularly striking when it comes to his descriptions of nature; the plants and trees come to life and it’s clear that Junger is writing as a man with knowledge of his subject.
As for the allegorical elements, well they’re certainly present. The book was published in 1939, at the end of a decade when Junger had rejected numerous overtures from the Nazi party, and it’s difficult not to see them reflected in the portrayal of the violent and thuggish Rangers (although I’ve seen the Chief Ranger equated with Stalin); their behaviour is brutal and visceral in places. However, the book has more to it than just an unsubtle take on National Socialism; there are many other factions involved and I would say that there is more of a debate on the position of intellectuals in society and how much they should involve themselves in such conflicts.
There’s also a slightly worrying detachment in Junger’s narration, as if he’s almost implying that a certain caste should be beyond such things; and despite the fact that Otho and the narrator have fought wars in the past, they choose to escape from the Grand Marina by ship at the end of book, calling in a favour from a past contact. So, is Junger saying that the only choice is for men of intellect to flee tyranny and look for safe haven? What happens if there is no safe haven any more? And is it better to stand and fight tyranny, put yourself above it or simply try to ignore it out of existence?
In the end, “Marble Cliffs” asks more questions than it answers and to see it as swipe at Hitler is too simplistic. Instead I think it should be read as Junger’s statement of the superiority of the intellect, as a cry out for the civilised human and his/her plight when faced with the baser elements of the race. Whether you think that’s a valid stance to take or whether you think sitting In a glass house while the apocalypse rages round you is morally right or even sensible is another matter. Nevertheless, it certainly makes for a fascinating and very relevant read in our modern world which is still filled with conflict; so often these battles are between culture and barbarism…
This lovely new NYRB edition is a fresh new translation by Tess Lewis, and if I had been able to find my original copy (translated by Stuart Hood) I would have made some comparisons! Alas, it has disappeared somewhere in the stacks so I can’t. What I will say, thought, is that this version reads beautifully; the language is lyrical and poetic, the landscape as alive as if you were in it, and the characters wonderfully conjured. The book comes with an introduction by Jessi Jesewska Stevens, and an afterword by Gaston Bachelard from 1943, both of which enhanced my reading of it; Stevens explores Junger’s politics beliefs and contradictions, offering us the choice of exploring the book as an argument for culture or a justification for a retreat from engagement.
“On the Marble Cliffs” is a fascinating read, and a very unjustly neglected work. Whatever your thoughts on Junger and his views, the story is a powerful, often beautiful and engrossing one, and definitely worth exploring. A timely reissue by NYRB, and one that I thoroughly recommend.
(Review copy kindly provided by the publisher, for which many thanks – “On the Marble Cliffs” is available on 31st January)
Jan 27, 2023 @ 07:12:24
This does indeed sound very interesting, especially the point you raise about the morality of flight.
Jan 27, 2023 @ 13:36:04
It’s a fascinating book, and raises more questions than it answers, for sure. The world is finite, and the danger is that if you keep running away from evil rather than trying to stop it, it will eventually swamp everything. But it takes gumption to stand and fight. A difficult moral choice…
Jan 27, 2023 @ 09:21:29
Hmm. I thought of Pippin and Merry in (the Jackson film of) LOTR: “What can we do, anyway? It’s too big for us. We have the Shire.” “There won’t *be* a Shire, Pip.” Flight and self-isolation only work for so long, don’t they? And surely the responsibility of the intellectual classes is to either seek meaning in the mess or to try and find a way to stop it. All very difficult questions which it sounds like Junger himself was wrestling with in real time…
Jan 27, 2023 @ 13:34:50
That’s a good analogy – it can be so difficult to stand up to big scary forces of evil, and the natural reaction is to flee. But if we all keep fleeing the bully boys will eventually catch up and take over everything. Running in this case seems potentially a cop-out and as you say I think this is something which concerned Junger very deeply. Makes for a fascinating read! 😀
Jan 27, 2023 @ 12:06:40
This sounds so interesting! I like the way the setting is depicted, and it’s interesting to see how the morality issues are brought up. What interests me at least as much is the author’s history. It sounds as though he had fascinating life, too!
Jan 27, 2023 @ 13:23:27
It really is a fascinating book, Margot, for so many reasons! The writing is wonderful, the moral crises interesting, and as you say the author’s history adds much to the reading of it. A very worthy reissue!
Jan 27, 2023 @ 16:59:55
Definitely an interesting question and one that came up in the Zweig/Montaigne book too–what indeed is the course when one doesn’t wish to take one side or the other?
Jan 28, 2023 @ 11:15:25
Exactly that, and Zweig’s despair at the loss of European culture caused him to flee and then take his own life, which is tragic. It’s hard if you are against fighting, but I guess eventually you have to take a stand…
Jan 28, 2023 @ 13:11:27
It was indeed; but one can also sympathise with one who feels fighting isn’t the answer.
Jan 28, 2023 @ 13:24:07
Very much so – as a pacifist myself I totally get that…
Jan 27, 2023 @ 17:05:11
Perennial dilemmas for those caught up against their will in a despotic repressive regime and, just maybe, of relevance to those of us currently living in just such a despotic, repressive (albeit shambolic) regime? At least we’re able to protest – for now…
Jan 28, 2023 @ 11:14:19
Very much so – and despite my pacifist tendencies, I don’t know what the answer is. I do believe, however, that any other country than this would have been rioting by now with what our Government are up to – certainly the French would!!!
Jan 27, 2023 @ 23:42:04
I can understand why you’ve returned to this book a couple of times, the questions it raises are so fundamental and difficult–there are no easy answers to them, and the unusual setting is an interesting way to explore. Throw in his own life and it all becomes even more tangled!
Jan 28, 2023 @ 11:13:21
It’s definitely a book that deserves re-reading, and by setting his book in an undefined region it can transcend its time very well. I still don’t know what the answers are, and I understand his feelings re taking what culture you can and fleeing from the barbarians – but you can’t outrun them forever, which is I guess why we had the Second World War…
Jan 28, 2023 @ 01:58:27
Wow, I love this review. Did you get more out of it, or see it differently, than when you read it in your 20s?
Jan 28, 2023 @ 11:11:45
Well, I’ve read it three times now – I don’t recall a lot of what I thought in my 20s, but I hung onto it and know I regarded it highly. I think between my last read and this one my views are pretty much the same, in that he poses a lot of difficult questions about how we should tackle the rise of any kind of evil. And that unfortunately continues to be very relevant for human beings nowadays… 😦
Jan 28, 2023 @ 06:40:50
I have not read him, but I remember his works in my uncle’s collection and his saying he was a complicated author to read. And from your review, it does seem that a linear comparison of Nazi and Hitler with the plot will not be suffice. I will explore his works.
Jan 28, 2023 @ 11:09:27
Your uncle was definitely right, he’s a complex author and gives no easy answers. Worth exploring and I hope you enjoy him!
Jan 28, 2023 @ 18:09:47
This does sound a very complex read and very thought-provoking. I find the setting quite unnerving too, although I’m not sure why!
Jan 28, 2023 @ 19:19:22
The setting is a little surreal and strange, certainly, which adds to the effect of the story. A really interesting and quite unique book!
Jan 29, 2023 @ 10:44:52
A very thought provoking, allegorical read, especially given it’s year of publication. That moral question about deciding to fight is a particularly interesting one.
Jan 29, 2023 @ 12:43:29
It is, and Junger explores it in a very interesting way, despite not really giving any hard and fast answers. Which I suppose is what makes it so fascinating!
Jan 29, 2023 @ 22:09:31
I read “Storm of Steel” but not this one. Now I’m tempted. Thanks for the heads-up.
Jan 30, 2023 @ 11:46:05
It’s definitely worth some of your reading time – a fascinating book! 😀
Jan 30, 2023 @ 01:13:48
I read his Glass Bees and A German Officer in Occupied France and wow, what a writer. I’ve had Marble Cliffs on my TBR for a couple years now, and maybe I’ll finally read it in this version.
Jan 30, 2023 @ 11:45:46
He certainly is a brilliant author and I do recommend htis one! 😀
Mar 03, 2023 @ 06:34:59
This seems like a wonderful book that explores serious issues. I will try to get a copy of it.
Mar 03, 2023 @ 11:01:14
It’s a very powerful book with much food for thought – I hope you enjoy it if you track it down!