As a rule, I tend to try and choose my reading carefully; after all, life is short and I own more books than I’ll ever be able to read (although having so many is something of a comfort in these times of supply chain crises…) However, I do sometimes feel I should step outside my comfort zone more often, and so when Notting Hill Editions kindly offered me a review copy of one of their new essay collections I accepted, realising that I really was challenging myself… The author is Roger Scruton and the book “Confessions of a Heretic”, a collection of his essays. Published by Notting Hill Editions in one of their lovely cloth covered volumes, this is apparently a revised edition (I believe a couple of essays have been removed) and is introduced by Douglas Murray.
Scruton is described as a philosopher and political thinker, and his views are decidedly conservative; mine, fairly obviously, veer to the left. So it was inevitable that our views were unlikely to coincide. Nevertheless I approached the book with an open mind and was prepared to listen to the author, even if I didn’t always agree with him.
The book collects together eleven of Scruton’s works and these range over many topics. From modern art through our relationships with animals, conserving nature and defending the west, Scruton has strong views which he does present very eloquently. And on the odd occasion, I did find myself in slight agreement with him (I *do* wonder about modern art at times!) However, if I’m honest I mostly disagree with his views, and often quite vehemently. He’s a man who approves of Empire and dislikes modern architecture; and I found his views on government unrealistic as he makes the mistake of assuming that all people are capable of making reasoned decisions and behaving rationally. Scruton’s discussion of the problems of the longer lives we lead nowadays was interesting, though, and he did have some valid points upon our constant usage of screens nowadays in another essay.
However, we parted company strongly on his attitude towards animals – I am *never* going to see eye to eye with a man who says he loved his horse, which died under him while he was out hunting… And from what I know of his views on women, I know we would never see eye to eye.
Reading “Confessions…” was an interesting, if sometimes infuriating, experience. I’m happy to explore ideas opposite to my own, but I did find Scruton’s thought much too far from my own viewpoint. And I felt that a lot of his thinking came from a position of male, white, moneyed privilege which gave him an air of arrogance and lack of empathy with different kinds of people. However, I shall consider my mind suitable expanded by having explored the thinking of someone so diametrically opposed to my own, and at least I probably won’t need to read any more of his work….
Review copy kindly provided by the publisher, for which many thanks.
Sep 24, 2021 @ 08:23:22
Hmmm, reminds me of some of my neighbours: perfectly nice people, might occasionally agree with them, but poles apart in world outlook generally. 🤣🤣
Sep 24, 2021 @ 09:25:13
Yes, it’s that kind of thing. I can have a conversation at work and then realise that the person’s outlook is diametrically opposed to mine (like the staff member who voted Brexit…) It’s very unsettling!
Sep 24, 2021 @ 08:25:34
Well done, you, for reading a book by a commentator whose views are antithetical to your own. I found myself agreeing with something Iain Duncan Smith said recently and was appalled – was this the slippery slope of ageing? I can’t remember what it was now, possibly the shock has wiped out my memory!
Sep 24, 2021 @ 09:24:30
I’m always happy to explore other people’s ideas, but at the end of the day his viewpoint was just too far away from mine!
Sep 24, 2021 @ 12:01:19
It’s a good experience sometimes to read views that are so different in some ways. I think it’s best to stay open-minded, and I give you credit for that. I know people like that, too; they may be delightful to talk to, or pleasant to have as colleagues, etc.., but where you know there will never be a meeting of minds.
Sep 24, 2021 @ 13:27:17
I definitely think it’s good to be open to other ideas, although unfortunately there does come a time when they move too far away from your own belief. I’m always willing to give the person the benefit of the doubt, though…
Sep 24, 2021 @ 12:59:05
LOL It’s always important to know what The Other is thinking!
Sep 24, 2021 @ 13:20:28
Good point…. ;D
Sep 24, 2021 @ 13:15:29
I admire your determination to explore other viewpoints but . . . sad as it is, I’m afraid these polarized times have taken their toll on me. I will occasionally read political & social commentary that is diametrically opposed to my own beliefs (in fact, there are certain pundits I check out on a regular basis) but I could never make it through an entire collection of essays by any of them; I’m afraid that mid-read I’d pop off from rage. Well done for endurance for endurance on your part!
Sep 24, 2021 @ 13:20:20
I know exactly what you mean. Nowadays viewpoints are at such extreme ends of the spectrum that it’s hard to find any kind of meeting point. I was interested to see what Scruton’s views were like, but realised early on that we were poles apart. A new reading experience, though!
Sep 24, 2021 @ 22:05:37
Well done for stepping outside your comfort zone. It’s definitely good to do that, and we need to know what the other side so to speak might be thinking. However I probably don’t have the discipline to read it.
Sep 25, 2021 @ 08:00:55
I like to try to read widely, but at the end of the day Scruton’s views are definitely too far from mine! But and interesting experience!
Sep 25, 2021 @ 00:54:28
I’ve read a couple of Scruton’s pieces and definitely sympathize with your reaction. He certainly seems to look at the world from a very limited viewpoint. Both women and animals seem to fit into his world as ‘how do I see this creature?’ rather than autonomous beings. But as Lisa says…
Sep 25, 2021 @ 07:59:49
Yes, my world and his are very far apart and I did feel quite uncomfortable at times with his viewpoints. And yes – Lisa does have a good point….
Sep 25, 2021 @ 13:46:15
Hi, if you would like to discuss potentially opposing perspectives on “Modern Art” with someone who shares your view of Scrutton in general, please do get in touch and come and meet me at Tate Modern or Whitechapel (for e.g.) 🙂
Sep 26, 2021 @ 15:07:41
LOL! I do like a lot of modern art – but Damien Hirst leaves me totally cold….
Sep 26, 2021 @ 16:25:05
Me too (re Hirst’s “formaldehyde” series, the dotty ones I have some liking for) but until the newest addition to the Tate Modern was opened I really found some of the large installation pieces they have shown a little less than engaging. Now that they are to be seen in the big spaces that are available I have had quite a different (and much more positive) response to many of them.
Sep 25, 2021 @ 18:09:27
Gosh, that does sound like a challenging read – and what on earth was in the essays they took out, I wonder!!
Sep 26, 2021 @ 15:07:06
Yes, it did have challenging moments… As for the missing essays, one is called “Dancing Properly….” – I’ve seen bits of it and frankly it reads like the complaints of an old fogey, which may be why it was removed.
Sep 25, 2021 @ 19:25:13
Good on you take on this challenge. And I had to laugh at this when you said, “as he makes the mistake of assuming that all people are capable of making reasoned decisions and behaving rationally.” I live in the US…if only this were true….!
Sep 26, 2021 @ 15:04:23
It’s not true over here either, I’m afraid – the amount of ill-informed idiocy I encounter on a daily basis is very depressing… 😦
Sep 26, 2021 @ 02:53:22
Bravo on sticking to something like this! It does sound like the usual stuff an entitled, moneyed, white man will write so I will pass this one. Though I do ADMIRE your ability to voluntarily read something so diametrically opposite to yours. I know we need to keep an open mind, but some things need such openess, that it’s really an act of perseverance, courage and good manners. Just like your effort here! 🙂
Sep 26, 2021 @ 15:03:33
Thank you! I could have gone on a rant, but nowadays I try to be measured in my responses. Politics in general are bad enough for the blood pressure without me losing it over a commentator I don’t agree with! 😀
Oct 03, 2021 @ 21:57:44
I’ve been doing a fair bit of this in recent years (i.e. since 2016, which might lead anyone reading this who doesn’t know otherwise to think I’m American, but I’m northwards and, as they say, when America sneezes Canada catches a cold). It’s sometimes frustrating (especially when I start to tabulate how much time I’m not spending with books/shows/podcasts/etc. that I’m a more natural match for) but I think perspective is important and sometimes one does tend to get lost in one’s own. 🤨🧐
Oct 04, 2021 @ 09:10:59
Yes, that’s a good point – I know what my views are but it doesn’t hurt to have them tested a little bit.
Oct 07, 2021 @ 19:49:47
I really admire your open-mindedness on this. I don’t think I could manage it right now – I do think it’s good to step outside our echo chambers though.
Oct 07, 2021 @ 20:16:39
It did stretch me a little – but certainly did nothing to change my views.
Dec 31, 2021 @ 07:02:36