…which may not be a title you might expect to see on the Ramblings, as I do as a rule try not to skim through a book – I feel I should really read it properly or not bother! However, there were a couple of titles which I flicked through recently and it was an odd experience!
A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian by Marina Lewycka
Mr. Kaggsy, bless him, presented me with this one as a possible holiday read (not that we went anywhere, but while I was on the summer break from work I *did* read quite a lot…) It’s a book I’ve actually considered a couple of times over the years, and with my interest in all things from the Slavic regions I thought it might appeal…
I *wanted* to like this book, but I really struggled. The writing is in the present tense, which I rarely like, and the narrative was just – well, a little flat for me. I didn’t engage particularly with the characters and the plot was silly but I didn’t find it funny. I ended up skipping to the end just to see the resolution, and was surprised to find that when the reason for the rift and the issues between the sisters who were the two main characters was revealed, it was actually quite a dark one. This left me thinking that perhaps the book could have had more done with it, but in the end it was far too superficial and not for me, so I’ve popped it into the ever-growing ‘donate’ box for when I can get the charity shops to collect again.
On Chapel Sands by Laura Cumming
I’ve seen this particular title pop up on a number of blogs I follow, and looking at the reviews generally it seems to divide readers. It’s a memoir by author Cumming focused on the time her mother was briefly abducted from the titular beach for a short period when she was three years old. The mystery has haunted Cumming and the book follows her searches into her family history to find out what *really* happened and the mystery behind it. She reveals all manner of family secrets as well as surprising complicity in events from local people.
Usually I find this kind of thing interesting; for example, Richard Beard’s “The Day That Went Missing” was a similar kind of read, delving into lost or forgotten elements of the past. However, “Chapel Sands…” just didn’t gel for me; the plot was interesting, but perhaps not that unusual for the time; and the reveal was too slow. I found myself recognising and resenting the devices the author was using to build the mystery, and I ended up becoming frustrated and skipping through it.
Additionally, Cumming built into the narrative meditations on art and photography (which is relevant as both she and her mother are artists); however, I felt this worked less well than in a book like, say, “Paula” where Sandra Hoffmann’s explorations of her family photographs meshed brilliantly with the type of narrative she was constructing. Cumming’s book didn’t integrate those elements well for me and they ended up jarring, getting in the way of the storyline; and I felt ultimately the book fell between two stools. I know others have responded to this one much more positively, so it may just be me. Mind you, I *was* reading a library e-book on the tablet, so that might not have helped…
****
So a couple of not very successful reading experiences, which is most unusual for me as I do try to pick books I’m going to respond to or enjoy or get something from. At least I didn’t waste too much good reading time on them…
Oct 02, 2020 @ 07:44:27
No point forcing yourself Kaggsy, reading is supposed to be fun! I also rarely skim, though it has been known…
Oct 02, 2020 @ 10:58:16
Absolutely note – which was why I skimmed. I don’t do it often but felt justified here!
Oct 02, 2020 @ 08:40:54
Always hard to give up on books you’ve had hopes for. If it’s any consolation I shared your lack of enthusiasm about the Lewycka which was flavour of the month back when it was published.
Oct 02, 2020 @ 10:57:55
It is, but I didn’t want to spend too much time on books I wasn’t loving. Nice to know I wasn’t the only one not grabbed by Tractors… – it was very popular wasn’t it, but I have seen dissenting voices!
Oct 02, 2020 @ 08:44:59
Mr. Penguin read the Tractors of Ukraine and the sequels and loved them all. Funny that. I have them here but they are unread. Sometimes books just aren’t right at the time. …..or never. 😁💕
Oct 02, 2020 @ 10:57:08
Well, they do seem to be popular, but not every book is for every person. And since I was ungripped I will probably not bother again! 😀
Oct 02, 2020 @ 12:11:07
Awww, say it isn’t so, I loved Tractors and thought it was clever the way she used humour to raise important issues.
Oct 02, 2020 @ 15:24:24
I’m afraid so…. It just didn’t gel for me, and I think much of it was to do with the style of writing. I saw the darker elements were there, but too buried for me. Never mind – we can’t all like the same things!
Oct 03, 2020 @ 02:31:04
No, true, it would be very boring if we did.
Oct 03, 2020 @ 15:37:02
🙂
Oct 02, 2020 @ 12:32:02
Although I’m unfamiliar with these specific books, I know the feeling you describe quite well. Like you, I mostly choose books that I think will give me something positive — pleasure, knowledge, insight or a different slant on the world, so I mostly like what I read. When the inevitable dud pops up, I think a good skim is a very logical response!
Oct 02, 2020 @ 15:23:41
I think so – I felt inclined to see them through to the end but in a quick way! Not every book will work for me, I know, but mostly they do. Onward and upward!
Oct 02, 2020 @ 15:05:26
Tractors is on my shelves too but somehow have never felt inclined to pick it up though it was very popular a few years ago.
Oct 02, 2020 @ 15:23:00
It was, and I thought at the time I would probably enjoy it. In the end it wasn’t for me – but you can’t win them all!
Oct 02, 2020 @ 16:11:38
I had Tractors as an audio book when it was published and do remember I found parts of it funny though preposterous. But now I remember nothing about it – not even the resolution – which is a good indication that it wasn’t that great a book
Oct 02, 2020 @ 17:36:43
It certainly wasn’t the right book for me at the moment; maybe at another time it would have worked, although the present tense was a bit of a problem…
Oct 02, 2020 @ 16:43:55
I LOVED Tractors, but I listened to the audio! I laughed on each drive that week! Sorry it didn’t do it for you, but I wonder, too, if I’d have liked it as well in print.
Oct 02, 2020 @ 17:36:08
No, not for me, but I’m glad you enjoyed it!
Oct 02, 2020 @ 17:03:44
We can’t all like the same books, can we. I rather liked Tractors.. some years ago, though I think I preferred Two Caravans by the same author. I haven’t read On Chapel Sands. I also find it hard to give up on books, so sometimes skipping a bit is a useful tactic.
Oct 02, 2020 @ 17:35:53
No, it would be dull if we did. Though I hate to abandon a book which is why I thought skimming was a good compromise!
Oct 02, 2020 @ 17:12:54
I’m sorry you didn’t like Tractors I really loved it and the next one about fruit pickers, it would be very boring if we all liked the same things though and you’ll make someone very happy picking it up in the charity shop!
Oct 02, 2020 @ 17:29:24
True! I’m happy to pass it on to a more appreciative reader. It just wasn’t for me right now!
Oct 02, 2020 @ 19:02:42
There’s a particular disappointment when a book you’ve looked forward to doesn’t quite meet expectations. But love those books that surprise with how good they are. I remember Tractors as having some good parts, but unmemorable overall.
Oct 02, 2020 @ 21:35:31
I know that feeling, though less so nowadays. But I did expect to engage more than I did with this. The present tense was definitely an issue and might be partly why I didn’t really engage.
Oct 02, 2020 @ 19:06:49
I can never remember if I liked A Short History of Tractors because I read it very close to Carrie Tiffany’s Rules for Scientific Living (also a strangely titled novel) and I really loved one and only liked the other (and now probably will never know which is which). Perhaps it’d’ve been more enjoyable on an actual holiday.
Oct 02, 2020 @ 21:34:04
I suspect so – it was too surface level for me mostly and I couldn’t engage. Never mind – I have plenty more books!
Oct 03, 2020 @ 09:08:19
Gosh that’s funny I was thinking of recommending Two Tractors to our work book group, which is still ailing along, mainly hampered by terrible book choices. Someone said Little Prince yesterday and I said NO! It’s my friend who keeps recommending books based on the fact that she read them 25 years ago and found them magical, and when she returns, finds they aren’t as good as she remembers (while the rest of us are finding that they weren’t even as good the first time round.) I think Two Tractors might be like that for me – it was novel at the time, but I think I have read more and better since.
Oct 03, 2020 @ 15:36:56
It’s funny how our attitude towards books changes; some will age well and some won’t and I suspect you may have a point that it was a bit different when it came out but not one with longevity. Not for me anyway! But maybe your book group would like it because it might have a broad kind of appeal if you have a mix of people in the group. And at least you might get some interesting conversations going!
Oct 03, 2020 @ 10:46:36
I’ve not read Tractors so can’t comment on it. I did read On Chapel Sands and agree with you. It didn’t work for me and I found it too laboured. For me a good book is one that lingers in the memory and that I want to return to at some point. That doesn’t apply to On Chapel Sands.
Oct 03, 2020 @ 15:35:04
Yes, I think laboured is a good word. The structure and the mechanisms of the book were too obvious to me, and I didn’t engage really which is always a sign that a book is not for me!
Oct 03, 2020 @ 12:44:46
Fair play! I read Tractors years ago and can remember nothing about it apart from perhaps some cherry trees?? The other one I have been flirting with but never quite fancying so I will take your lead on that!
Oct 03, 2020 @ 15:34:16
Lol! Well you may enjoy the Cumming book – I know Jacquiwine did and so I may be in the minority. Maybe do what I did and try a library copy! 😀
Oct 03, 2020 @ 21:25:09
Oh, shame about On Chapel Sands, as I’ve been so intrigued by it. I was going to wait until I found it in a charity shop, and might still give it a go then. The Richard Beard definitely is on my mental tbr.
Oct 04, 2020 @ 15:48:52
Well don’t let me put you off, because lots of people loved it including JacquiWine. The Beard is good too, though I found the pivotal reveal a little understated…
Oct 05, 2020 @ 13:52:09
Shame you didn’t like Tractors… I liked it a lot. I’ve read most of what she’s written since, in fact. But hey… no two people…
Oct 05, 2020 @ 14:31:56
Indeed! And I might well have liked it more had I read it another time – you never can tell!
Oct 10, 2020 @ 22:30:16
My reaction to Tractors was much the same as your’s – I didn’t like the style, the characters weren’t credible. the plot was ridiculous. And I was disappointed, because so many people really rated it, but I couldn’t engage with it on any level whatoeve.
Oct 11, 2020 @ 10:16:23
I’m glad it’s not just me. The writing seemed very flat to me and I couldn’t engage at all either!
Oct 10, 2020 @ 22:31:07
… whatsoever… butterfingers typing. Sorry!
Oct 11, 2020 @ 10:15:35
LOL! 😁