Sanditon by Jane Austen
Back in 2017, when the world and his dog were celebrating the bicentenary of the death of Jane Austen, I spent some time with a beautiful and newly released edition of her teenage writings. It was a wonderful read, and as I said at the time, it was many decades since I’d read any Austen. Pleasingly, I’ve just had the option to go from the very start of her oeuvre to the very end, with a lovely new edition of her last work – “Sanditon”, from Oxford World Classics.
Austen’s life was not a long one, and looking at her biography it’s amazing that she managed to produce the works she did; all of which have made her one of the country’s best-loved authors. However, it seems that she might have been heading off in a different direction with “Sanditon” and who knows what route her work would have taken had she lived longer.
“Sanditon” opens with a dramatic scene of an overturned coach and an injured ankle (or “Ancle” as Austen renders it); fortunately, the travellers, a Mr. and Mrs. Parker, are not seriously hurt and take refuge with a local family, the Heywoods. Mr. Parker is a friendly, talkative man with a bee in his bonnet; that of turning the little fishing village of Sanditon into a place to rival the likes of Brighton and Eastbourne. To this end he’s invested much time and money, along with his business partner, Lady Denham. Parker soon attempts to persuade the Heywoods to visit Sanditon, but as Austen puts it so beautifully, they are “older in Habits than in Age” and never leave their own village. However, seeing a chance for their daughter Charlotte to improve her circumstances, they agree to allow her to accompany the Parkers back to Sanditon.
Here we encounter all manner of characters, each with their own particular agenda; there is, of course, Lady Denham, a grasping woman who obviously married for money and status, and is as mean as they come; her beautiful companion Clara, who seems to have usurped all other potential heirs in her ladyship’s affections; there is Lady Denham’s nephew and niece, Lord Edward Denham and his sister Esther; Mr. Parker’s extended family which consists of two hypochondriac sisters and a lazy brother, all of whom are convinced they have every ailment under the sun; and any number of peripheral characters who would no doubt come much more to the fore had the book been completed.
Unlike some of her longer books, Austen takes us straight into the action; and in a short fragment of only 73 pages she sets her scene, introduces her characters, paints them beautifully for us to see and sets them on her stage ready to go. She nails her characters quite wonderfully; for example, of Lord Edward, who seems to pay court to every woman around and is obviously being set up to be a romantic fool or a rotter, she says:
The truth was that Sir Edward whom Circumstances had confined very much to one spot had read more sentimental Novels than agreed with him.
And Mr. and Mrs. Parker are conjured brilliantly in just a paragraph:
Upon the whole, Mr. Parker was evidently an amiable family-man, fond of Wife, Children, Brothers and Sisters – and generally kind-hearted; – Liberal, gentlemanlike, easy to please; – of a sanguine turn of mind, with more Imagination than Judgement. And Mrs. Parker was as evidently a gentle, amiable, sweet tempered Woman, the properest wife in the World for a Man of strong Understanding, but not of capacity to supply the cooler reflection which her own Husband sometimes needed, and so entirely waiting to be guided on every occasion, that whether he were risking his fortune or spraining his Ancle, she remained equally useless.
I had forgotten just how *funny* Austen is – her wonderfully snarky and deadpan descriptions of her characters and their flaws caught me unawares and had me laughing out loud. She’s marvellously droll on the subject of hypochondriacs, malingerers and quack medics; and the two Parker sisters are a riot, with their litany of illnesses and hysterics.
What was equally fascinating was the aspect of the seaside resorts. The excellent introduction by Kathryn Sutherland (who was one of the academics involved in the “Teenage Writings” volume) discusses this, and reminds us that Asten was from pre-Victorian times when women could go in for nude swimming with the help of a bathing machine (entertainingly illustrated on the cover of this edition). Certainly, there was a belief that the seaside could cure every ailment and Mr. Parker seems to believe that:
Nobody could catch cold by the Sea, Nobody wanted appetite by the Sea, Nobody wanted Spirits. Nobody wanted Strength. – They were healing, softing, relaxing – fortifying and bracing – seemingly just as was wanted – sometimes one sometimes the other. – If the Sea breeze failed, the Sea-Bath was the certain corrective; – and where Bathing disagreed, the Sea Breeze alone was evidently designed by Nature for the cure.
“Sanditon” ends after 12 short chapters, and Austen put it aside during an illness; she never returned to the book and died four months later at the age of only 41. There’s a poignancy about all unfinished works of great writers – reading “The Mystery of Edwin Drood” had the same effect – and we can only wonder at what Austen might have done with her characters, and wish her health had been better…
As the supporting material reveals, there have been many attempts to continue and finish “Sanditon”; several of them sound intriguing, but of course we have no real way of knowing what was in Austen’s mind. However, we do have what she wrote, and this is an excellent edition (as OWC books usually are). It’s well put together, with the aforementioned introduction, notes, bibliography, chronology and notes on the text. The book retains Austen’s beautifully eccentric spelling and punctuation, which adds charm to her story, and I found myself falling in love with Austen’s writing once again.
I understand that “Sanditon” is being adapted for TV, screening in the Autumn, and it does seem that Austen’s themes, as well as the behaviour of her characters, are universal. I guess someone will have to come up with a considerable amount of plot development and an ending, and it will be interesting to see what that is. However, in the meantime, this is a lovely way to reacquaint yourself with the writing of the wonderful Jane Austen, and although I’d love to know how she envisaged the direction of her story, I don’t really mind – I just feel happy to have spent some time with the lively and entertaining denizens of “Sanditon”!
NB – notice how I’ve immediately gone off-plan… At least it’s with a woman author! 😀
(Review copy kindly provided by Oxford World Classics, for which many thanks!)
Aug 05, 2019 @ 07:12:30
Jane Austen is one of the few classical authors I know where I really, really, really want an audio book read by the author.
Aug 05, 2019 @ 08:17:58
Now *that* would have been incredibly cool! 😁
Aug 05, 2019 @ 07:41:46
Fascinating stuff. I don’t think I’ve ever come across this Austen before. What a tragedy that she died so young and never had a chance to finish it, particularly as the set-up sounds excellent. You’re right to highlight her talent for humour, a somewhat underrated quality in her work, I feel.
Aug 05, 2019 @ 08:19:10
I guess it possibly gets less publicity because of its unfinished state. But it’s still a wonderful read just because of her writing and her humour! Such a tragedy it was never finished.
Aug 05, 2019 @ 08:08:11
I’m just reading this. It’s tantalising that we get all the characters in position and seeds of the plot but never get to see them played out. The new adaptation is going to be interesting if only to see how Davies manages to make a whole series out of so little material. There’s even talk of a second series.
Aug 05, 2019 @ 08:21:10
It *is*tantalising, and although she prepared the ground well we can’t tell where she was going with the book. I wonder if the TV series will draw on any of the previously issued *endings*? Part of me is curious and part of me wants to leave what exists to stand alone!
Aug 05, 2019 @ 09:06:34
This was probably more of a first draft, and I can’t help feeling that the characters would have been a bit more fleshed out and the sarcasm a bit less obvious. Or maybe Jane Austen was growing increasingly cynical or fearless as she grew older?
Aug 05, 2019 @ 09:14:24
You may be right, and if it’s the case that things would have been smoothed out later, I’m glad I got to read this version! But I got the impression from the intro that she may well have been becoming snarkier with age (a tendency I recognise in myself….) 🤣 Whatever, I just loved reading this!
Aug 05, 2019 @ 10:58:21
I loved your review Kaggsy. You have brought out the fun of reading it so well. I have written about Sanditon on my own blog, but I had also read it long before blogging, and I had read the best known continuation back in 1975. We Austen fans love to think about where she was heading with this book, and with her writing in general. Was she launching out into new directions?
As for the film/tv adaptation coming, it will be interesting to see. When my Jane Austen group discussed the novel last we had a few opinions about where it was heading, and one of our members has read enough to see that it’s not heading in HER direction. I reckon it will head in mine, but I’m not competitive! Haha.
Aug 05, 2019 @ 16:32:33
Thank you ! If I read this ever (and I don’t think I did) it would have been decades ago so well pre-blog. I read a lot of classics back in the day. This one *does* indeed read as if she was taking her writing to a new place and it’s such a shame it was never finished.
I imagine the adaptation may polarise lovers of Austen’s work. After I’d scheduled my post, Mr. Kaggsy read me a news story about it and I have to say I have reservations. I don’t think it will be one for me, but I *do* love the book very much!
Aug 06, 2019 @ 06:11:26
I’ll probably watch it, if the opportunity arises, but I’m not a huge one for completions and sequels, I must say.
Aug 06, 2019 @ 16:57:07
Yeah, me neither…. ;D
Aug 05, 2019 @ 13:24:09
It’s many years since I read this, I have it in a collection with Lady Susan, The Watson and Sanditon. I don’t remember them at all. I think there is a film or TV adaptation of this one coming soon.
Aug 05, 2019 @ 16:30:18
That rings a bell – I may have had that collection too. There is a TV series due, though I imagine there will have to be a *lot* of non-Jane content to justify a whole series.
Aug 05, 2019 @ 14:18:59
I too have this along with other shorter works, sitting on the shelf. I kind of like the idea of her getting snarkier as she aged – but still quite young
Aug 05, 2019 @ 16:29:34
Me too – and her teenage writings had a bit of an edge too, so I don’t think she was quite as refined as she might be portrayed!
Aug 05, 2019 @ 18:09:33
Quite so, in fact I don’t think of JA as especially ‘refined’ – not in the way say Nancy Mitford is/was. There’s always that critical edge with her, that poised critical sensibility that saw through the veneer of country house sophistication. She must have been quite a tough cookie
Aug 05, 2019 @ 20:16:30
No, you’re right. She may couch it in discreet terms at times, but she most definitely has a sharpness which is very refreshing!
Aug 05, 2019 @ 14:51:19
I hadn’t heard of this book before. Thanks for bringing it to our attention! Excellent review!
Aug 05, 2019 @ 16:28:53
Thank you! Even though it’s unfinished it’s most definitely worth reading – such wonderful writing!
Aug 05, 2019 @ 15:08:08
I think I read this in a collection of shorter and unfinished works many years ago. A television adaptation worries me a little, but you have tempted me to re-read.
Aug 05, 2019 @ 16:28:31
I may well have had a collection myself in the past – it rings a vague bell, but so many books have passed through my hands. Like you, I’m vaguely worried about an adaptation, but then I always think the book is better – particularly if it’s unfinished and we don’t know what the author intended!
Aug 05, 2019 @ 18:59:07
I’ve always been wary of reading unfinished books – it’s a feeling of devastation when you reach the end which is not the end. I’ve made a couple of exceptions – Drood and Stevenson’s two unfinished novels, St Ives and Weir of Hermiston. I think I’ll have to make an exception for this as well – best read it before the TV adaptation.
Aug 05, 2019 @ 20:15:56
Yeah, I know what you mean. I thought I could guess where Drood was going, but you never know. Some authors I would make an exception for and Austen is one of those. Is Weir worth investigating do you think?
Aug 05, 2019 @ 20:31:07
Yes – could well have been his best novel if completed (I believe he thought so anyway!)
Aug 05, 2019 @ 20:34:17
Ah – well I may have to investigate then! 😀
Aug 06, 2019 @ 09:28:27
I know what you mean, but I guess I read these books with a very clear purpose which is to understand more about a writer I really like – rather than to enjoy a story – if that makes sense. If I go into it with that thought, I’m not devastated (though I still feel sad!)
Aug 06, 2019 @ 16:58:23
Yeah, I get what you mean, and as I love Dickens and Austen I was enjoying the reading process even though I knew there was no ending as such to come. And I love Stevenson too, so I guess I may have to check out Weir!!
Aug 07, 2019 @ 00:22:13
I have some Stevenson but I have never read him! Terrible isn’t it?
Aug 07, 2019 @ 08:38:30
Well, we can’t all read everything! I’ve read a little but I do want to read more.
Aug 07, 2019 @ 08:52:37
Haha, Kaggsy, no we can’t more’s the pity!
Aug 07, 2019 @ 10:34:55
🤣
Aug 06, 2019 @ 13:45:22
It sounds so fun, and what a shame we’ll never quite know what was supposed to happen. Funny Austen is my favourite Austen, and she was wonderfully sarcastic.
Aug 06, 2019 @ 16:53:27
She’s beautifully snarky in this one Simon – and yes, such a pity we’ll never know where she was taking it!
Aug 07, 2019 @ 19:55:14
This sounds fun, even in its unfinished state. I have the same edition that Ali mentions, I’ll have to dust it off as I don’t remember the details of Sanditon at all!
Aug 07, 2019 @ 20:31:04
It really is, and the uncorrected spelling and grammar adds to the charm! I think may have had that edition once as well, but I can’t remember a thing about it – which was nice, because I came to this completely fresh! 😀
Aug 08, 2019 @ 19:15:00
Agree.
Aug 08, 2019 @ 19:14:50
Reading it today and feeling the same about her and her work as you do.
Aug 08, 2019 @ 20:34:21
😀 She was such an excellent writer!
Mar 14, 2023 @ 07:00:27