There’s something about having a literary crush (and goodness knows I’ve had enough in my time!) that makes it hard for me to write rationally about an author or explain why I think they’re so wonderful – and I’m at that point with Georges Perec’s works at the moment! Instead of being able to discuss things in a sane manner I shall go all fangirl and rant on about how utterly brilliant his books are and how everyone should read them – which is really not constructive, is it??
In retrospect I’m surprised I came across Perec so late, as he seems so closely linked with Calvino (one of my biggest author loves). Nevertheless, I adored “Life: A User’s Manual” and I’ve since read “W” which was also pretty impressive. “Species of Space” is a collection of mainly non-fiction works (the title piece plus excerpts from others) and in many ways these defy classification. Perec turns his eye to all manner of subjects, from space itself to a collection of holiday postcard texts to a list of what he had eaten throughout a whole year, lists of objects on his work desk and thoughts about how to classify books in your library.
This is such a fascinating book, with so many quirky unusual pieces, all in Perec’s trademark tone. Several pieces prefigure other works such as “Life” and “An Attempt at Exhausting a Place in Paris”, and they all have the effect of making the reader look at things with fresh eyes as if from the outside or for the first time. We’ve all had that experience where if you look at a word for long enough it becomes strange and loses its meaning; in the same way, Perec is urging us to look at things until they are no longer familiar, until we lost a little of our grip on reality and the world becomes odd.
As with “W” Perec’s work seems very much informed by his past and it definitely helps to know some of the facts of his life, ably provided in the introduction by his biographer (and translator of this selection) David Bellos. Perec has a way of circling round the facts and approaching them obliquely, which may be his way of trying to deal with things when it is too painful to do so head on.
This is fiction and reminiscence as classification; Perec’s day job for a large part of his life working as an archivist in a science laboratory and its often reflected in the structure of his work and the way in which he presents his writing. It could of course be argued that this is his way of trying to exert control over a life which was blighted by trauma and loss, a way of trying to classify his life so it makes sense. And there is the sense that from the very act of classification comes clarity, as if it teaches us to *really* look at things, really see them.
I was thinking how much his narrative voice reminded me of my beloved Calvino, when lo and behold Perec dropped a quote in from Italo’s “Cosmicomics” – synchronicity or what! In fact, the presence of Calvino permeates the book; apart from two parts that refer to or quote his works, “Two Hundred and Forty Three Postcards in Real Colour” is dedicated to him, and there is a quote from him on the back of the book.
There is much that is moving here, in particular the section “The Rue Vilin” where Perec makes several visits back to the street where he spent the first five years of his life. Each time, more has changed and more decay is evident – it’s as if he’s trying to gain a sense of place, to grasp hold of the memories before the tangible evidence is gone. This work sent me off to the Internet, looking up the street, and I found several astonishing things: firstly, the steps at the end of street are really iconic and have featured in a number of French films (see here). Secondly, the place no longer exists (which was quite shocking) and is now a modern park….. But thirdly, there is film of Perec visiting the Rue Vilin and then being interviewed here – I only wish my French was better….
“My spaces are fragile: time is going to wear them away, to destroy them. Nothing will any longer resemble what was, my memories will betray me, oblivion will infiltrate my memory. I shall look at a few old yellowing photographs with broken edges without recognising them.”
I’ve always liked ‘clever’ writers – ones who play with words, twist the genre, taking writing somewhere unexpected. And I love Perec’s playfulness and his profundity; and the fact that reading his work makes you look at the world completely differently. He’s definitely going to be one of my favourite writers for a long time to come.
Aug 20, 2014 @ 14:07:48
I’ve been simultaneously interested in and intimidated by reading some Perec. But if he’s similar to Calvino, I must read him!
Aug 20, 2014 @ 14:15:30
I would say definitely so! I was intimidated at first, but I absolutely loved “Life: A user’s Manual” and I haven’t looked back since!
Aug 20, 2014 @ 17:33:45
I read ‘How toAsk for a Raise’ recently which was great fun, I have a copy of ‘Life’ here begging to be read and I keep picking up, but not taking out, ‘A Void’ from the library. I like this playful writing also. This book looks like a great collection….onto my TBR pile.
Aug 20, 2014 @ 18:29:32
Perec’s just wonderful – “Life” is a commitment but definitely well worth it!
Aug 21, 2014 @ 00:13:58
Have you read any other Oulipo authors such as Queneau?
Aug 21, 2014 @ 09:44:58
Not yet – Queneau is high on the list to get to (and I have a book out of the library) and I also have a Herve Le Tellier. However, there’s always Calvino, of whom I’ve read everything….. 🙂
Aug 25, 2014 @ 20:26:44
Actually, I think being a fangirl is a good thing, especially when you’re reading such an intellectual! My husband had read and liked Perec, and though it doesn’t quite sound like my thing (being more a Victorian type, I admit it’s not my kind of thing), I love your enthusiasm. It takes great care to write such posts.
Aug 25, 2014 @ 20:56:19
Thank you! I do love Perec’s work very much but I can see he wouldn’t be everyone’s cup of tea!
Nov 27, 2016 @ 22:35:34
Currently reading this. Rather struck by how his idea that if everybody lists their likes then we can get at what we have in common. This may have been, for him, a search for belonging.
Nov 28, 2016 @ 10:14:50
You could well be right – he was something of an outsider and you do get an idea that he never felt he fitted in anywhere.
Nov 28, 2016 @ 19:49:01
People in the arts nearly always describe themselves as outsiders. Being part of an arts professional class, even group membership/s (the OuLiPo for e.g.) struggle to dissuade anyone from the power of the trope.
Perec might be seen clearer according to his peculiar circumstances and responses. The usual story about him is that the absence at the heart of A Void (the missing e) reflects an experience of losing parents so young. His desire to encourage literary listing as a kind of Venn diagram for discovering cultural commonality would seem to fit that narrative as a salve for pain. It’s hardly an idea that can be evidenced. Maybe it’s what amounted to ‘belief’ for someone who was so touched by senselessness?
I’m only halfway through!
Nov 28, 2016 @ 21:50:58
So he’s obviously proving a rewarding read, then! I think absence is crucial to Perec’s work and pretty much informs it. And I still have to read A Void, which I must do soon.
Sep 24, 2020 @ 17:55:12
Love ‘vivre le livre!’
Sep 24, 2020 @ 18:14:56
Quite like it myself, and it *does* rather sum me up! 😀