So we reach May – well, actually, nearly the end of May – and book five in the LibraryThing centenary read of Barbara Pym’s novels. This month’s book is “A Glass of Blessings” and I feel it’s fair to say it’s one I’ve had to struggle with a little.
Our narrator/heroine is Wilmet Forsyth. Wilmet is 30, married comfortably to Rodney and lives with him and his mother Sybil. Wilmet is unemployed, childless and mostly bored, and so occupies herself with church, shopping and seeing old friends, while Rodney works for the civil service. A chance reacquaintance with Piers, brother of her best friend Rowena, leads to flirtations and daydreams, all the while spiced up by the goings on of the various priests and parishioners around them. But disillusionment and some surprises lurk round the corner.
In many ways we are in familiar Pym territory – a parish plus its priests and excellent women; a middle class setting; several misfits and Pym’s trademark acid wit. However, I found one big obstacle at the start of this book and that was Wilmet herself. Self-centred, self-interested and complacent, she really is a very unpleasant character. Although she mellows, and recognises some of her faults by the end of the book, I almost stopped reading after the first chapter because of her appalling smugness, and the bland, ready acceptance of the fact that it was ok for her to have no children, no job, and nothing to do but swan around all day shopping and thinking how nicely turned out she was!
“I amused myself by observing these students, who seemed to be of all ages, until I came to the conclusion that people who went to evening classes were all more or less odd. It was unnatural to want to acquire knowledge after working hours. A tall bearded young man, whose string bag revealed a loaf of bread (the wrapped sliced kind), a tin of Nescafe and two books from a public library, filled me with a kind of sadness, as if his whole life had been revealed to me by these telling details.”
Patronising or what!
Her light-hearted flirting with Rowena’s husband Harry seemed actually heartless and hollow, especially when it turned out that Rowena knew about it – and although Wilmet blithely thought how wonderful it was that they were good friends and that this was all ok, I’m not sure it really was. Likewise, the passion she develops for Piers turns out to be groundless as he is quite happily settled in his flat with his friend Keith, and they presumably simply admire her as a poised, elegant woman and nothing else!
If the novel had only consisted of these characters I would have been bored very quickly, but fortunately it is saved by the excellent array of supporting characters. The various priests (Father Thames, Father Bode and Father Ransome) are funny, individual and all likeable in their own ways. Mr. Bason, who leaves the civil service to cook for the priests and somehow ends up in Cornwall running some kind of an antique shop, is a hoot. And Sybil, Wilmet’s mother-in-law, is a joy – she provides a counter voice all the way through, and is a strong, sensible woman who ends up pulling off one of the biggest surprises of the book. Then there is Mary Beamish, a classic “excellent woman”, looking after an ageing invalid mother and unsure of whether to pursue becoming a nun or marrying a priest! I liked Mary immensely, in a way that I couldn’t like Wilmet – in fact, Wilmet’s treatment of her at the beginning of the book is really unpleasant – and I was glad to see Mary in the end find her place in life. There were several appearances of characters from previous books: Archdeacon Hoccleve; Catherine Oliphant; Prudence Bates; and even Rocky from “Excellent Women”, who it transpires that Rowena and Wilmet had both been in love with when they were in the Wrens in Italy, and then went on to meet their husbands. And there is a devastating depiction of the horrors of suburban married life in the form of the cocktail party thrown by Rowena and Harry when Wilmet is visiting for the weekend, which had me wincing and laughing at the same time.
I finished the book perhaps a little unsure of the point Pym was trying to make; and also wondering if she had deliberately made Wilmet so unlikeable for a purpose? It may be that she was trying to show Wilmet’s transformation from a self-centred woman into a slightly more rounded person, with more understanding and genuine feeling for the people around her. However, I’m not sure that that really came across strongly enough. As Piers points out to her:
“… there are others in the world – in fact quite a few million people outside the narrow select little circle that makes up Wilmet’s world.”
though he does go on to try to soften the blow a little:
“… I didn’t really mean to imply that you’re to blame for what you are .Some people are less capable of loving their fellow human beings than others… it isn’t necessarily their own fault.”
By the end of the book, Rowena and Harry seem to just slip out of the story, presumably Harry’s flirtation with Wilmet having come to an end; Piers and Keith, Sybil and Arnold, plus Mary and Marius have settled down; and Wilmet and Rodney, having confessed their silly flirtations, buy a flat and are brought closer together. Are we to think, then, that finding a mate and making a go of it are the only options? Piers and Keith certainly seem to form a normal sort of domestic couple, although the glimpse the pampered Wilmet gets of the modern world of coffee bars is very far from her normal surroundings. Unlike her other books, Pym appears to be lauding the married state, albeit with a cynical enough eye to see that the handsome Marius Ransome is marrying the mousey Mary Beamish from any number of motives, including the fact that she has plenty of money and will be the perfect vicar’s wife!
“…I found myself wondering whether Marius would not find it all rather too exhausting. But perhaps with a good wife and a comfortable home, not forgetting the embarrassment of old Mrs. Beamish’s money, he would struggle through somehow.”
This wasn’t a bad book – I doubt Pym could write such a thing as her prose and wit are excellent – but I found it difficult to get past Wilmet’s character and it was an interest in the subsidiary characters that kept me going until the end, and not in the main protagonist. Enjoyable but flawed would probably be my summing up!
*********
(As a postscript, I should say that I’ve continued thinking about this book since finishing it and writing my review, and I found myself recognising several other themes hidden in there: the glamour that must have attached to Rodney and Harry when the two Wrens met them during the war, and the inevitable change in their relationships when returning to peacetime and ordinary life; the pointless state of middle class women with literally nothing to do but fritter away their lives in a little gilded cage, remote from reality; the capacity in human beings for self delusion. Pym always has plenty to say about life and living, but I’m now even more frustrated about the fact that the unloveable character of Wilmet gets so much in the way!!)
May 29, 2013 @ 11:57:09
Even not-as-good Pym is good reading 🙂 I’m glad this book kept swimming around in your head for a few days. I haven’t read this one yet and will be on the lookout for it.
May 29, 2013 @ 11:57:53
Exactly – despite Wilmet there was definitely enough to keep me reading to the end!
May 29, 2013 @ 12:39:10
I agree the supporting cast rescued this book, and I loved Mr. Bason and Mary Beamish, too. Your postscript is thought-provoking — maybe there was a point to the novel after all!
May 29, 2013 @ 13:01:01
Well I do often find that thoughts about a book keep fermenting for days after I finish it. And I think Pym usually had a point to make, but I think too much was obscured by the shallowness of Wilmet!
May 29, 2013 @ 17:28:02
I really liked the character of Mr Bason and I liked poor Mary Beamish too, Wilmet is fairly horrid – although I think she improves slightly toward the end. I agree that Pym was probably being a bit cynical about marriage .
May 29, 2013 @ 17:31:08
Yes, I suppose Wilmet did improve a bit – though she was still very complacently smug at the end!
May 31, 2013 @ 01:52:56
Hello! This is an interesting post. I just recently borrowed this one from the library and have yet to read it, and now am wanting to start on it after reading all this, just to see what I make of it. I sometimes have rather mixed feelings over Barbara Pym’s books, as it seems she sometimes has a melancholy tint to many of her characters, but of course I like some stories better than others.
May 31, 2013 @ 10:02:38
Thank you! Yes, you’re right, there is a melancholy element to some of her characters, but she usually ends up with up-beat endings!
Jun 06, 2013 @ 16:04:42
I’m going to be a lone voice here because I didn’t dislike Wilmet, I mostly just felt a bit sorry for her. I agree about all the others (I adore Fr Thames), but I mostly found Wilmet rather wistful, if not actually melancholy. By modern standards her aimlessness seems rather reprehensible, I admit, but not by those of her time. And I do think she had grown up a bit by the end, recognising her wish for a lover as essentially silly, and being, on the whole, quite glad for what she did have. Counting her blessings or smugness? It can be hard to tell from the outside.
Jun 06, 2013 @ 16:17:41
I don’t think you *are* in the minority because quite a few other people on LibraryThing didn’t dislike her either! I think maybe she would improve on a second reading, but I did still find her a bit too complacent at the end. But maybe Pym just thinks we should be grateful for what we have!
Jun 08, 2013 @ 19:57:51
I just read this book this week and felt much the same as you about it. Wilmet is an odd mixture, being self-assured and superior and highly critical in seeking out the faults in others, but on the other hand she is rather passive and drifts along and not really very intelligent, as she seems blind to what is happening to those closest to her. There was quite a lot of humour in this one though, which was great. If you are interested. and not Pym-ed out, I’ve just written a Pym blog myself!
Jun 08, 2013 @ 20:02:21
Yet, Wilmet did get in the way for me, as the supporting cast were wonderful. Nice post on your blog!
Jun 01, 2014 @ 05:12:35
I wonder if Ms Pym liked Wilmet? Like Ms Austen, with Emma, did she create a ‘heroine’ that she thought only she would like? I cannot comment as yet sine I still haven’t obtained a copy of ” A Glass of Blessings” to read yet. It will be interesting to compare the two books when I do.
Jun 01, 2014 @ 11:29:08
Very possibly! I think she certainly drew on a lot of her own life when she wrote her books! And she certainly used the awful Wilmet to make some good points about bored married women!
Oct 13, 2015 @ 18:10:14
I found Wilmet rather likable, though my own review I think also referred to her as self-centred interestingly (but then, she is). For me it was the lightness of prose, the astute comic observation and as you say the supporting cast which won me over, but Wilmet too was part of it.
Nice review, and nice too to read a slightly different take than mine was.
Oct 13, 2015 @ 18:44:56
It would be dull if we all reacted the same way to books – certainly Pym’s writing is wonderful and I hope I’ll return to her work one day.
Sybil arranged the flowers in a heavy cut glass vase, rather badly. | Pechorin's Journal
Oct 13, 2015 @ 18:11:17